Oh, Go ahead: Bring the Horse in the House!

© Davidson Loehr

March 12, 2006

First UU Church of Austin

4700 Grover Ave., Austin, TX 78756

www.austinuu.org

Listen to the sermon by clicking the play button.

STORY: The Horse in the House

It happened in the summer of 1955, and was both logical and necessary. We lived in Colfax, Iowa, a town of about 1800, twenty miles east of Des Moines. Formerly located on Highway 6, the Interstate bypassed it when it went in in the early 1960s, kind of leaving it where it was.

But where it was – at least in 1955 – was a wonderful place, at least for a 13-year-old boy with a horse. My younger brother also had a horse, named Spooky. Spooky was white, and hot-tempered, at least to me, though my brother seemed to get along with him.

My horse was brown, with a big white line running up the back of his left hind leg, around his rump and back down his right leg. He was laid-back and cool, and his name was Louie.

The horses were our freedom. We could come home from school, throw a saddle on, and just ride, ride, anywhere. A couple times on weekends, we left on horseback to make camp for the weekend. I had a Marlin lever-action .22 caliber rifle and a saddle holster, just like I knew all real cowboys had, and would hunt big game for our vittles. OK, squirrels. Whatever. We”d make camp, cut down some saplings, or cut branches, make a corral that straddled the small creek, so the horses wouldn’t wander off. Then I’d shoot a squirrel or two, which we”d cook on a stick over an open fire, then retire to sleep using our saddles as pillows, just like in the movies. I don’t think cowboys really used saddles as pillows. It’s very uncomfortable.

When my brother Peter and I were 13 and 10, our horses were sometimes our best friends. We fed them, cleaned their stable in the barn, and rode them around the fenced pasture next to the house almost every day. I had a paper route that went from downtown straight out Main Street about two miles out past our house. Every day, summer and winter, I’d get to our house, saddle up Louie, and we”d finish the route together. We were close.

My brother Peter and I used to like to give the horses sugar cubes, which they gobbled out of our hands almost too eagerly. That was until the vet said the sugar cubes would rot their teeth and we shouldn’t do it any more. Bummer. They liked carrots and apples fine, but they also had a sweet tooth. We understood.

We were looking for a loophole in the “no sugar cubes” deal. I think we found it by chance one morning, when my brother didn’t want to finish his grape juice because it was too sweet. The words hit like a revelation straight from the gods – or at least the god Poseidon, who was also fond of horses.

After our mother left for the day, we poured some grape juice in the dog bowls on the rickety back porch. The horses loved it! But there was an unexpected bonus that made it all even better. The grape juice made their noses and tongues purple. Now that was cool! Horses with purple tongues and, in Spooky’s case, a purple nose!

The occasion giving rise to the center of this story came on one of those days when both horses were up on the back porch, drinking grape juice out of the dog bowls. When Pete took Spooky back down, he broke the wooden steps – really, it’s amazing that both horses didn’t fall straight through the porch.

Well, now Louie was stuck up there on the back porch. He wouldn’t jump down, there wasn’t any other way off the porch, and our mother would be coming home in an hour or two. This called for quick thinking, which kids mostly know they’re pretty good at. We had two friends over, who would help with the horses in return for getting to ride them. I shared my plan. Joey could take Louie’s halter, I’d go ahead to clear away the furniture, and we would lead the horse through the house and out the front door, over the new porch with its sturdy cement step. Oh yes, and Jimmy would walk behind Louie, carrying a metal bucket, just in case. Jimmy protested, but he was the littlest, so it was only fitting.

No sooner had I announced this grand and eminently logical plan than my brother jumped on Spooky and rode away as fast and as far as he could.

The plan worked beautifully. I cleared the furniture out of the way, Louie was very well-behaved, and Jimmy whined all the way through the kitchen and dining room about the sorry hand that Life had dealt him.

When we got into the living room, the television was on, and Louie stopped. His ears shot forward, his eyes got big, and I could feel him thinking “Hey – we haven’t got this out in the barn! The Big House is a whole other thing!” I saw the family camera sitting on a hall table – a Kodak Brownie Hawkeye with flash bulb attachment – and quickly took a picture of this scene.

But I wasn’t as quick as Jimmy. When he saw me going for the camera, he walked up by the horse’s shoulders, and set the bucket down.

This was not good timing. It was not good timing because when the flash bulb popped, it startled Louie. And Louie pooped on the rug.

I yelled at Jimmy – his duties had been made very clear. But he snapped back – petulantly, I thought – “I am not going down in history holding a bucket behind a horse’s butt!” It was a good point, well taken.

Still, there was the poop.

We took Louie out the front, got him back into the barn, and both Joey and Jimmy disappeared as quickly as my brother had a few minutes earlier.

I scooped the poop, but it wasn’t going to be that simple. There was a stain. Not dramatic, but noticeable. I went into the kitchen and looked under the sink, where wondrous and mysterious Chemicals are kept. And there was a big bottle of Glamorene Rug Cleaner. It was, I’m quite sure, the only time in my life I ever saw or used that product, but its name was stamped in my mind forevermore.

Luckily, I had a bucket. Of course, if it had been used in the first place, I wouldn’t have had to use it in the second place. I filled the bucket with water, dumped in a lot of Glamorene, got a brush, and scrubbed.

Glamorene Rug Cleaner was truly miraculous! Unfortunately, there was now a large wet spot, a couple feet across, which was even more noticeable than the original stain. My mother had never been accused of being a good housekeeper, though this was the first time I saw that as a good thing. I took a throw rug from the other side of the room and covered the wet spot.

She never noticed. Neither did my father. And Peter knew better than to say one single word. During the day, I’d take the rug off, covering it again before my mother came home. In two or three days, the rug was dry, and looked like its scruffy old self again. When I moved the rug back where it belonged, both parents suddenly noticed it had been moved, though I assured them it had always mostly been there.

In short, I pulled off the caper of the century. I got away with bringing Louie through the house, even though he had had that little accident in the living room. In the days to come, both my brother and I would laugh about it while we were out riding. Certain kinds of kids live for moments like that.

It was – I don’t know, maybe two or three weeks later: a long time later. I came home from some serious playing, and no sooner had the screen door shut than I heard this Mother Voice shouting “Howie! Come in here!” Every kid knows that voice, and knows what it means.

I stood a little paralyzed there by the front door, wondering – not what I’d done, but what anyone could possibly have told her about. Nothing. There was nothing. I’d either been quite good, or left no evidence. I was sure of it. I went into the kitchen, and every kid knows just what comes next. With my most innocent look, I said “Yes, Mother?”

She was not a happy woman. “What do you mean, bringing that horse in the house?”

This took really quick thinking. Could she possibly know about that? It didn’t seem likely. Pete wouldn’t dare tell. And Jimmy and Joey knew if they blabbed, they”d lose their ticket for free horse rides. And Louie didn’t talk. That’s it. She couldn’t know.

So again with the innocent kid look, I said “What horse?”

The next line was the Voice of Damnation and Doom: “I just got the pictures back from Walgreen”s!”

Poop. That horse. Louie, the cool, laid-back horse. Ah, yes.

The next moments were a bit awkward. Denial seemed out of the question. But explaining the logic of it – and especially how responsibly we brought the horse into the house, with moving the furniture and Jimmy and the bucket and all – that was a little trickier. And then there was the matter of the poop. I couldn’t really leave that out. And the Glamorene, and the wet spot – which finally cleared up the mystery of the moving throw rug. It was actually quite a complex story. And telling it did sound a bit odd, even though it was all quite logical from beginning to end.

As I stumbled through the story, I suddenly saw a gift from the gods, a shot of pure Grace: the corner of her mouth twitched. She was on the verge of laughing! Oh, Hallelujah!

Again, every kid would know what move to make next. “What’s the matter, Mom? Are you going to laugh? It’s really pretty funny, isn’t it? Huh?”

Her expression was one of those that should have been filmed. She needed to be serious – it was still Serious Parent time – but she could barely keep it in. Finally, she blurted “I have no idea what to say to you. I would feel ridiculous saying “Don’t bring that horse in the house again”!” I look back on that as about the most ideal way a parent could handle this situation – not that more than like one in a billion parents will ever have to face this situation. As for the back steps; they were rebuilt, but I don’t remember anything about it. Maybe Pete and I had our allowances docked to help pay the carpenter, but I don’t think so. I think the family absorbed Louie’s Big Day as one of those Memories we’re always trying to make – or perhaps as the sad sign of a child too far gone to save.

And that’s the story of how the horse was brought into the house, way back in the summer of 1955 when both I and my world were a lot younger and simpler.

But as logical as it is, I have learned through the years how filled with Basic Disbelief many people are. Like you. You don’t quite believe it – at least not all of it – do you?

Oh, come on. This is better than most history. Even if you don’t believe it, can’t you pretend to?

But no. No. And so, for those too cynical to accept the simple truth of a childhood memory from a half-century ago, a gift for you too. I carried that photo in my billfold for over twenty years. Louie was with me through the Army, in Germany, even through the Vietnam War. Then sometime in the mid-70s, while I was spending a weekend with my brother’s family, he picked my pocket as I slept, stole the picture, and sent it off to have it copied. At Christmas, he gave me a 16×20 print of that old photo, complete with its fading and scratches, which I then had mounted and framed. It still hangs on my office wall today.

PRAYER

There are little sparks of life around that we often miss: a special person, a twinkle in the eye of someone who just seems to very real to us.

Little lights are scattered here and there in our lives: people, places, even things that can awaken our own spirit in ways large and small, but in ways we wish for.

So often when life seems dull or we seem to be in a rut, we’ve lost sight of those sparks, or lost touch with them. Spontaneous things, unplanned fun, or contact with those people who have such a young spirit, no matter how old they are.

There is an old mystical story that says all these sparks are parts of God, and that our task is to find them, draw them to our lives, and use them to transform ourselves and our world back into an image of God.

Drawing the world back into an image of God sounds like a task far beyond anything we can do. But we do recognize those moments, people and places that make us feel more alive, that seem to make life offer more options, that open us up.

Let us start there, attending to the sources of inspiration that make us feel more alive, more thankful, more joyful. Let us claim those sources and the little sparks of life they offer, even if they offer them only to us.

The task of reconstituting the world is too big to imagine. Let us bring it down to a level we can see and feel: reconstituting one spirit at a time, one life at a time, one relationship at a time, to make them show forth more light, love, and joy.

It’s a start. A good start.

Amen

SERMON: Oh, Go ahead: Bring the Horse in the House!

There is a wonderful story from medieval Jewish mysticism about how in the beginning, God existed just as undifferentiated infinite light. But God wanted to behold himself, and so he created the world; the world is the image of God. Then God withdrew, and the world was no longer the image of God, but a fractured, separated place. But spread throughout this world, there are billions and billions of sparks from that divine light that can connect us with all that is sacred.

Our task in life is to cherish those sparks that it is our good fortune to encounter in life, and to raise and spiritualize them, so we can reconstitute the world as an image of God. Each of us, they say, encounters those persons, events and things that contain sparks that we are uniquely suited to redeem.

And our sacred task in life is to find those sparks we are lucky enough to come across, to cherish and embody them, to lift them up and spiritualize them, and by doing this to reconstitute the world so that it can once more take on the image of a God of love, justice, happiness and peace.

There are a lot of ways to describe those sparks, but when you’re around one you usually notice it.

Mostly, we seem to notice those sparks when they’re gone.

I think of the final lines from a poem written 150 years ago by Thomas Hood, called “I Remember, I Remember.” It’s looking back to a childhood when the world seemed to be whole and sacred, but looking from a present where it isn’t. The final lines of the poem say,

I remember, I remember,

The fir trees dark and high;

I used to think their slender tops

Were close against the sky:

It was a childish ignorance,

But now ’tis little joy

To know I’m farther off from heaven

Than when I was a boy.

He’s talking about heaven as though it were above the sky. But the real “heaven” he’s talking about was that state of spirit in which we were close enough to the soul of life nearly to touch it.

And when we miss that – well, missing it has produced a lot of great tragedy and poetry, including some poignant funny poems. One of my favorite of those is a great favorite of women, at least women who think that one day they might become old. You’ve probably all heard it. It was written in 1961 by an English woman named Jenny Joseph, and her original title for it was simply “Warning”:

When I am an old woman, I shall wear purple

 with a red hat that doesn’t go, and doesn’t suit me.

 And I shall spend my pension on brandy and summer gloves

 and satin candles, and say we’ve no money for butter.

I shall sit down on the pavement when I am tired

 and gobble up samples in shops and press alarm bells

 and run my stick along the public railings

 and make up for the sobriety of my youth.

I shall go out in my slippers in the rain

 and pick the flowers in other people’s gardens

 and learn to spit.

You can wear terrible shirts and grow more fat

 and eat three pounds of sausages at a go

 or only bread and pickles for a week

 and hoard pens and pencils and beer nuts and things in boxes.

But now we must have clothes that keep us dry

 and pay our rent and not swear in the street

 and set a good example for the children.

 We must have friends to dinner and read the papers.

 But maybe I ought to practice a little now?

 So people who know me are not too shocked and surprised

When suddenly I am old, and start to wear purple.

Sometimes, it seems that we lose the ability to see and save these sparks just by growing up. Thomas Hood’s poem longs for his first childhood; Jenny Joseph’s poem seems to be looking forward to her second childhood. That’s a big part of why it’s so much fun seeing the children come up for their story each Sunday: they bring that sense of wonder with them. They seem to do so easily what we grownups sometimes have trouble doing at all.

During my first year in the ministry, in 1986, I witnessed such a scene: one I’ll never forget.

It was after the third sermon I had preached there. I had written a series of children’s stories for those three weeks. They were like a serial, and were a simple story, if not a great one. It was a story about a bush that became unhappy just being a bush because all those darned birds kept taking it for granted and it didn’t have a starring role like the big trees did. The more unhappy it got, and the angrier it got at having to be a bush, the more its roots withdrew from the soil, until at last they pulled out, the wind blew, and it became a tumbleweed.

Now it roamed everywhere, but never had a home, and began feeling lonely. When the wind stopped for awhile, it found itself resting not far from a lovely little river, in a beautiful meadow. It was grateful for the rest, and to be in such a beautiful place. And soon, it put down roots and again became a bush. Now when birds came to sit in its branches, it was thankful for the company. It came to love the place, and all the other creatures in its world. And as that happened, it grew and grew, and finally became a very, very big tree. The End.

I wasn’t prepared for what happened after the service. In the foyer, a church member who was a physics professor came up to me, raging mad. He was actually red in the face, as he accused me of having done a ridiculous and shameful thing. My crime was that I had told the children a story that could not be scientifically true.

I could hardly believe it! It was ridiculous, he yelled, to say that a tumbleweed could again put down roots and become a bush. Though he didn’t know the scientific names of the plants involved, he was quite sure it couldn’t happen. And then, as though that weren’t bad enough, I had gone to absolutely stupid extremes by then telling the children that the bush could become a tree!

“It’s ridiculous!” he said, getting pretty worked up. Then he shook his finger at me and said “Do you actually believe that a bush can become a tree?”

I said Yes. Now he turned nearly purple. He was almost shouting, as he said “Well, I would like to know how in hell a bush can become a tree!”

That’s when the six-year-old boy who had been standing behind me waiting for his turn finally had all he could take. He stepped forward, looked up at the physicist, and said “It’s easy, Mister. It just has to learn how to love!”

You hear something like this, and it can be easy to feel like Peter Pan, like you never want to grow up if it means losing the ability to understand even the simplest of stories. The little boy had been waiting to tell me how much he had liked the three stories, and that he would never forget them. The man was in his fifties, with a Ph.D. in physics, yet actually seemed to think the story had been about a bush! If we must lose the ability to see even the simplest magic when we grow up,

But of course we do grow up. We have to grow up. Eventually, our parents want us to move out and get a job. And to do that – well, we have to grow up. You know, it’s one thing to have your kid bring a horse in the house once. But if every role of film you got developed had a picture of your child with another large heavy animal standing in your living room, you”d be looking for a good therapist.

There’s a famous passage from the Christian scriptures, written by St. Paul, where he says, “When I was a child I spoke as a child I understood as a child I thought as a child; but when I became a man I put away childish things.” (I Cor. 13: 11). When you think about it, it’s an odd thing to say, after Jesus had said that you can’t hope to enter the kingdom of heaven unless you’re like a child! Maybe Paul didn’t get it.

I don’t know quite what happens to us when we grow up, but something does seem to change – that change that Peter Pan was so afraid of. I remember stories on the old hippies of the 60s and 70s who had tuned in, turned on and dropped out, then growing into investment bankers and organization men and women, becoming the new incarnation of the very Establishment they had earlier hated, as they raised their own children and suffered through their teen-aged rebellions, wondering why they didn’t grow up.

Sometimes, it seems that part of growing up is losing touch with that spark, the almost magical and transformative insights of even the simplest fairy tales and stories – about a beauty that remains asleep until wakened by a loving kiss, about frogs turning into princes the same way, or tumbleweeds turning into bushes and then trees, just because they’ve learned how to love.

But without seeing the sparks within these stories, and being open to them, we really are farther off from heaven than when we were young. And the “heaven” in this story isn’t a place, you know, but that kind of life where it feels the sacred dimensions, the sparks, are right there near us, close enough to touch. That’s what we seem to lose.

Of course, growing up doesn’t have to mean just growing old, and we all know some people with both plenty of years and plenty of sparks. In fact, they are probably some of our very favorite people in the whole world. They’re some of the vessels carrying those sparks for us to find, and claim, and embody, in our own sacred task of trying to reconstitute the world so it can once again be the image of God, of all that is holy and life-giving.

When I was a graduate student, in a very arid, intellectual and sometimes impersonal graduate school, there were a few of these living sparks around, and they were absolutely magical for me.

My teacher was one of them. He was a man in his 60s who wore beads, had an earring, wore jeans, sometimes sandals, and open collars that somehow survived from the hippie movement, and shoulder-length hair, except on the top where he didn’t have much hair at all.

He looked like a walking refutation of grown-up seriousness. We became close, I had many dinners with his family, and still remember the feeling that one of the greatest living theologians was also an over-sized elf.

I had another professor who was much more sober and quiet, very grown-up. During the week, if he wasn’t teaching an advanced seminar or discussing the footnotes of footnotes, you would find John in the library, meticulously digging up even more footnotes.

Ah, but on Sunday night, after the sun went down, some of the students would gather in the lounge for an evening of playing Dungeons and Dragons. And there was John, playing the Dungeonmaster, dressed in a wonderful brownish medieval robe with hood and rope belt that his wife had made for him, his eyes twinkling like a six-year-old boy, and more excitedly alive than I ever saw him at any other time. On Sunday nights, he was just full of sparks.

And I suspect that if someone were to have asked John whether he actually believed in that ridiculous Dungeons and Dragons stuff, he might have said he actually believed that letting ourselves expand in imaginary escapades we’ll never be able to encounter in grown-up life can open up whole new and wonderful avenues for our souls to take flight.

In religious studies, you often call figures like this Trickster figures. Those are the figures that don’t follow grown-up rules, that bring spontaneity into life whether you want it or not.

Even the more official and restrained parts of the University sometimes welcomed in these Trickster figures, and there would be a quiet explosion of sparks that could just take your breath away.

The most memorable came one Christmas Eve, in the big formal service in Rockefeller Chapel. Built with the money of John D. Rockefeller, this huge stone building was over a hundred feet high inside, seated two thousand people, and seemed modeled on the magnificent cathedrals of medieval Europe. The Sunday services were so dismal it seldom drew more than fifty.

But on Christmas Eve, it was packed. Organ, huge choir, medium-sized orchestra, priests in formal robes, everybody being very sober and pious.

Then, into the middle of this great pomp, they staged a re-enactment of the old Bible story of Joseph and Mary looking for a place to stay. And slowly, from the end of the long stone aisle all the way to the front, came this year’s Joseph, and Mary – and real live donkey! A donkey! The little donkey didn’t know the story, didn’t care for the music or the costumes or much else besides the carrots Joseph would try to slip him unnoticed.

The donkey had no costume, no pretense at all, couldn’t have cared less about Christmas, and completely stole the show! Finally, when the donkey entered, there was something that was simply real. I don’t remember much else from the program that night, but the donkey, at least, was sacred, and everybody there with eyes to see could see it. There was one of those magnificent sparks, clip-clopping down the aisle: just clip-clopping and looking around.

Bringing the donkey into the temple revealed the temple in the donkey. And if even a little donkey could contain a temple, then surely we could, too. And just knowing that helps to accomplish the sacred task of reconstituting the world.

Sometimes just telling these stories is like bringing a donkey into the temple. That’s the role that stories, fairy tales, movies and some imaginative fantasy games can play for us, and it’s a role we need, if we’re going to find any of those sparks at all.

I don’t know if Mardi Gras or Burning Man or the others offer more escape than transformation. But anywhere that spirit is present, it can offer transformation, because it shows that power of life, that power that represents life unchained, that most powerful force anywhere.

How many of you have thought some version of “When I’m older and no longer afraid of what people might think, I’ll wear purple. I’ll do the harmless but outrageous things I don’t dare do now”?

What would those things be, that would let your soul take flight? Do you think perhaps it might be wise to practice them a little now, so that when you get older and have the nerve to do outrageous things that let your soul soar, people won’t be so surprised?

In the beginning, God, the divine and magical dimension of the universe, existed just as infinite light. But God wanted to behold himself, and so he created the world; the world is the image of God. Then God withdrew, and the world was no longer the image of God, but a fractured, separated place. But spread throughout this world, there are billions and billions of sparks from that divine light that can connect us with all that is sacred. And our sacred task in life is to find those sparks we are lucky enough to come across, to cherish and embody them, to lift them up and spiritualize them, and by doing this to reconstitute the world so that it can once more take on the image of a God of love, justice, joy, and peace.

My story about bringing the horse in the house may not be about much more than dealing with a problem you will never, ever have: what to do with a horse that’s stuck on your back porch before your mother comes home. That’s not a spiritual quest at all. Yet there’s something in it that still has some magic about it, a spark to it, even fifty years later, isn’t there?

Let’s not grow up without bringing with us that child’s ability to feel pure joy, to expect magic everywhere, and to find it. These sparks can come through so many different doors. They can arrive like a little donkey. They can be like a spark, or a lightning flash. Sometimes they come announced by that “still, small voice” that prophets have written about. And sometimes – you can trust me on this one – they even whinny.

Virtually the whole story is captured in this photo. At the far right, you can see the edge of the console-style television set. Louie’s alert eyes and ears speak for themselves. That’s Joey on the sofa, and Jimmy, derelict from duty, peeping over the horse’s shoulders. On the floor, you can still see the top of the metal bucket – which, like Jimmy, is about four feet from where it should have been.

What Are We Doing Here?

© Davidson Loehr

and Jack Harris-Bonham

March 5, 2006

First UU Church of Austin

4700 Grover Ave., Austin, TX 78756

www.austinuu.org

Listen to the sermon by clicking the play button.

PRAYER:

Davidson Loehr

Let us not hide our lights under a basket. We meet in this room with the sculpture of a flame in the wall, with a small burning light in our chalice, and with 150 more little personal lights sitting over in the window, waiting to be lit by members and visitors. We’re surrounded by symbols that say what we’re about here is finding and sharing a certain kind of light. So let’s not hide it under a basket.

All religions say they offer a light unto the world. But nobody cares what goes on inside those churches, or what the people in the little buildings think. The rest of the world wonders if we will have some light to share with those outside of our little building.

We have so many kinds of light – even more than those 150 little lights in the window can signify. And the world needs light of many kinds in many dark areas. Who will take light to the world if we don’t?

And so this symbol of light that surrounds and cradles us. Let us take some with us when we leave. Let us not hide our lights under a basket. Light deserves more, and the world needs more. Let this be a place where we learn to light our own lights, then take them out of here to offer to our larger world, each in our own way.

Just that could change the world. Just that.

Amen.

HOMILY: SANCTUARY – A Safe Place For You, By You & Of You,

Jack R. Harris-Bonham, Ministerial Intern

I tell you the truth, unless you change and become like little children, you will never enter the kingdom of heaven. (Matthew 18:3 NIV)

The kingdom of God cometh not with observation: Neither shall they say, Lo here! Or, lo there! For behold, the kingdom of God is within (among) you. (Luke 17:20b-21 KJV))

 

Introduction:

Kids – and I’m speaking to all the kids here not just the ones who are from the 1st to 6th grades. There’s a whole lot more kids here than that. In the reading from the Bible that I just read Jesus says that unless you change and become like a child, you will never enter the kingdom of heaven. So where is this kingdom of heaven?

The answer to that question is in the second reading – “for behold, the kingdom of heaven is within, or among you.”

Throughout history human kind has tried to represent the kingdom of heaven through the building of sanctuaries like this one. Why do you suppose there are windows way up high here in the front of our sanctuary? It’s pretty simple really.

Down through the ages we humans have been a lot more literal than we have to be. We tend to take things exactly as they are said. When we hear the words, “kingdom of heaven,” we tend to look towards the heavens – the sky. So a whole lot of cathedrals and churches tend to have light pouring in from above – from the sky.

When you enter a room you eyes tend to follow the light and so when a church, or sanctuary like this one is entered our eyes, our heads and our thoughts tend to go toward the heavens – the sky. So architects and builders of churches have given us a literal interpretation of the kingdom of heaven here on earth. They build sanctuaries that take our thoughts out of this world into the next world – the so-called kingdom of heaven.

But that’s not what Jesus meant when he talked about the kingdom of heaven. He was talking about a place that’s right here on earth – a place that’s easier to get to, if we have the mind and heart of a child.

The Zen Master, Shunryu Suzuki, once said, “In the experts mind there are few possibilities, but in beginner’s mind there are many possibilities.” When Suzuki-Roshi said “beginner’s mind” he was, in fact, talking about the mind and heart of a child.

What is it about the mind and heart of a child that helps us enter the kingdom of heaven? I mean here we are in a representation of the kingdom of God right here on this earth. We are in a sanctuary and this sanctuary is designed so that we can realize the kingdom. But the part that’s missing in most adults, the part that can help us realize the kingdom here on this earth is the imagination and wonder of a child.

In the child dedication ceremony that we do here at First Church, we say at one point in that ceremony, “Nothing is strange to the children for whom everything is new. Children do not yet know what belongs and what does not; therefore for them all things belong. Their ears are open to all music. Their eyes are open to all arts. Their minds open to all languages. Their being open to all manners. In the child’s country there are no foreigners.”

This gets at the heart of what it means to be in a sanctuary. For truly all things are holy and wonderful. It is in that spirit that we gather here in this sacred space. We gather to recognize each other as part of ourselves. We gather to have the imagination of a child’s heart and mind to see past our differences into the heart of the matter, which is that we all – each and every one of us – belong to one another.

There was a man once who wanted to learn to meditate. Meditation is like praying, but there are no words. Meditation is sitting quietly and doing nothing.

But the man didn’t know how – he didn’t know how to just sit and be quiet. Maybe you can understand this? Sometimes it’s hard to sit and be quiet. So a friend suggested that the man go to a place in his mind, in his thinking, a place where he would feel safe – a safe place.

But everywhere he thought of – the golf course, his job, his car, his home – none of these places felt safe to him, then, he remembered the way he felt in his mother’s arms. When he was a little boy and he got scared, he’d run to his mother and do this! (Hold arms up to be held.) She would take him into her arms and she would hold him tight and talk sweet to him. It didn’t matter much what his mother said, what really matter was the way she smelled – like perfume and cookies – and the way he was able to totally relax in her arms.

It’s that feeling of being safe and protected that best explains sanctuary. To be lovingly embraced by the warmth of a room full of friends.

And now I want each of you kids out there to open the special packages that were handed to you when you entered the embrace of this sanctuary. Inside you’ll find color crayons and a piece of paper. There’s going to be a number on one side of this paper. I want to invite you now to begin coloring on the side of the paper without the number – we need to be able to see that number.

Color your hearts out! Make those pieces of paper bright, bold and beautiful and hold on to them because those pieces of paper will be magically transformed at the end of the service.

HOMILY: What are we Doing Here?

Davidson Loehr

In most ways, asking what kind of religion we’re doing in this or any other liberal, non-creedal church isn’t a tricky question at all. We’re doing about the same thing that all religions try to do: help ourselves find better paths through life, and the courage to take them. And like all religions, we remind ourselves of this mission through the use of symbols and metaphors.

I think of this place in mixed metaphors. The symbol of light is our most powerful and persistent symbol, but I also think of this as a “garden of light,” where light seeds can be planted and grow, then we can take them out of here and bring our own kind of inspiration, our own kind of light, to the larger world around us.

In some ways, all of this is contained in that large symbol of the chalice with the flame in it, that Jack will be telling you more about in a few minutes. There really isn’t anything Unitarian in that symbol. It points back to a Roman Catholic priest of six hundred years ago who thought the spirit, the power of religion, symbolized by the Communion chalice, should be offered to all, not just to those approved by his church. There’s the spirit of liberal religion in one symbol: a chalice offering communion, a communion of light, to all the world, not stopping at the walls of a church or at the walls of a nation or at the walls of belief.

And that flame, that light, is what we like to think we have to offer: more light, a different and better way of seeing things, even if it is often highly unorthodox. That too is in the style of that old priest whose life and death we celebrate every time we look at the symbol of the flaming chalice. The flame has a much darker meaning, too, but I’ll let Jack tell you that.

But it’s all about sharing what we have with others outside these walls. Because until it’s been shared with others, there’s no communion. Nobody cares what Unitarians think. Nobody cares what Presbyterians busy themselves with inside their walls.

The world only cares whether our religion has filled us up enough so that there is some overflow that might share light and sustenance with those outside our little walls. That’s the “communion” the world needs from those who style ourselves “religious.” So the big light sculpted into the wall is to remind us of that high and hard calling. And the single flame that we light in our small chalice up on the stage is that same symbol, brought to life, to light.

But we also have 150 personal lights over there in the window, for you to light. And that’s like sharing the big communion cup with you, then letting you make it your own, in whatever form you give it.

Where do you take your light? Into your lives, into your families, into your jobs, into your thoughts and dreams, to let it shine there. But you know you have to take it out of this room before it can do any real work.

For many of you, the larger world you most want to share light with is your children, and they are probably the most important larger world we have. The children are the future of our families, our faith, and our world. That’s why so much of what we try to do here is meant to be of help to parents and children.

Not all of us here have children, so we try to share our light in different ways, usually through work or friendships. Artists try to bring more beauty; lawyers and lawmakers try to bring more justice; mechanics and engineers try to bring more creative efficiency; teachers and preachers try to bring more understanding, more light, more compassion. We all try to bring more of some kind of light into the parts of the larger world for which we have passion.

For me, it’s largely about finding patterns to things that make them more understandable, more useful. I love stories, and look for the plots that hold actions together. For almost all the sermons I do here, I’m looking for patterns that you can use within your lives, like the wonderful old story of Gilgamesh last week.

But I also have some passion for the world around me, because I think being an aware and responsible citizen is a civic duty that has almost sacred status. And as a veteran of the Vietnam War, I have a lot of passion for the subject of war, and a deep disgust at seeing the lives of soldiers wasted through illegal and dishonest wars. I have some interest in all sorts of things that define the larger world around us, and these too find their way into my sermons, as you know.

Three weeks ago, I preached a sermon trying to assert some patterns in that larger world outside our walls, and it was a good example of how this business of “light” works in this very bright and animated church.

As you know if you were here, it was a pretty contentious sermon, because I said during it that I thought our government was responsible for the awful attacks of 9-11. Well, it’s hard to touch such a powerful and important subject without having done some good homework, and without figuring out just how to frame it, and for what audience. And I must say none of that was done well.

But the uproar that ensued was all part of the process of offering our light out, then listening to critiques from people who don’t like that light, or don’t think it illuminates. It didn’t take long to realize that I had done it poorly and needed to do a lot more work before offering it out beyond these walls, and I did a lot of work during the past two weeks.

But this past Friday, that work had grown into a brand new essay, and a long one, about four sermon lengths, that I offered out to the Internet, and which is now posted on the first of what I suspect will be many web sites around the world, to see if it can stimulate further discussion of some of the important issues raised there (www.propeace.net).

Some of you liked the version of three weeks ago, some hated it, but it turned out to be just a “light seed” that got cut back, then grew into a very different kind of light. I’m happy with the new piece, though it has very little to do with the sermon of three weeks ago, and am happy to see it out where it will draw more comments and certainly more criticisms from that larger world beyond these walls.

I am trying to articulate the “frame” story that I believe is the plot that helps explain not only 9-11 but also our imperialism, our rapacious economy, our growing indifference to the poor, two rigged elections and much more. I think I’ve done it, so it is time to offer it out, to see what comments and critiques it will draw, and whether it can spark a good and ongoing discussion. It is bound to draw some angry criticism, no matter how many concurring sentiments it gathers, because that’s the price of sending offerings out into the larger world.

But I think informed and passionate attacks are exciting and positive, because I see that Spirit operating, and trust the process that can sort the grain from the chaff. The new title of the piece is “The New World Order Story,” and it will be posted on enough websites that I won’t post it on the church website because it isn’t a sermon, isn’t about religion, and is now really intended for an audience I might describe just as “citizens” or “Americans,” rather than just us. Like about five or six other sermons I’ve done in my six hears here, it wound up being intended for a larger audience, the one outside these walls.

But it grew here. It grew in this atmosphere where we come to seek more light – and yes, to criticize the quality of light that is sometimes offered. But this was the light garden where it grew, just as it’s the light garden where so many of your own lights grow, and are taken into so many other directions.

The faith of this liberal style of religion isn’t about all believing the same thing. That’s for religions of creeds and orthodoxies, religions that exalt a position. Liberal religion doesn’t exalt a position, but a process. It is about trusting the light, trusting people, and trusting the act of open communion. We believe that it is our job to share the light we think we have found with others outside the walls here, to make a positive difference in the world around us so that we might all find better paths through life, and the courage to take them. And we trust that people will use that light as they need to, as they see most fit, and that even if they use it in ways we wouldn’t have, I think there is a trust that it’s still a good thing to have more light in the world.

When we do it right, the light in that chalice really can symbolize light, enlightenment, illumination, and the spirit of life. When we do it wrong, that chalice light can revert to its original meaning, which Jack will tell you about shortly.

Now watching these light seeds grow can be kind of exciting, in a frustrating way, even when it’s done very awkwardly. It’s more fun when there aren’t so many birth pangs. But it is a sacred mission, this business of giving birth to more light, and taking it into the many corners of our many worlds, to try and make a positive difference, and to illuminate better paths. And that’s a good thing.

HOMILY, PART TWO: Sanctuary,

by Jack R. Harris-Bonham

Now, if the ushers will collect the beautifully colored pieces of paper. Kids just pass them down to the end of the aisle and the ushers will bring them up here.

Now, while that’s going on I want to show you something – it’s a sort of word puzzle. The older kids have an advantage here, but that’s okay – that’s how we learn by watching older kids give answers – answers that maybe we”d thought of, too, but were too scared to speak up and give.

(Hold up the sign with this on it: CH_ _ CH.) What’s missing in this word? (Wait for answers – hopefully some kid will have the right answer – if not – wing it!)

That’s right! What’s missing in “church” – U R! You see it’s like a joke, a pun, a play on words. What’s missing, what church is, wouldn’t be church, unless you are there!

I remember this hand game that I was taught when I was a kid. (Do the hand game about church.)

“Here is the church, here is the steeple. Open the doors and there are the people.” You see, without the people – there is no church. (Say while closing your hands) And it is the church, which lovingly embraces the people.

Back in the 15th Century there was a priest Jan Hus. He had a church in Prague, Czechoslovakia. Part of their church service was a meal – they shared bread and wine together. But back then the priests were supposed to speak in a foreign language, Latin, and only the priests were supposed to drink from the cup or chalice. But Jan Hus spoke the church service not in Latin, but in his native tongue, Czech and he passed the cup around and let everyone in the church drink from it. He was punished for doing that – in fact – he was burned at the stake.

In 1939 the Unitarian Service Committee that was helping people escape Nazi Germany had an artist named Hans Deutsch design them a symbol that would represent how Unitarians felt about the world. Hans Deutsch designed a chalice – like the one that Jan Hus passed to all the people, and in the middle of the chalice he put a flame – and the flame was Jan Hus as he was being burned alive at the stake. The message is clear. We Unitarians believe that the cup of knowledge, faith and love is intended for all people, and to back this statement up we put someone who died for that belief as a part of the chalice.

Now, I notice that some of you have been watching what’s happening over here. We’ve put together a giant puzzle from all the pieces that you colored and what have we made? Who can tell me?

(Wait for answers – or give clues)

That’s right! It’s the chalice. Chalice is just a fancy word for cup. The chalice or cup is a symbol for Unitarian Universalist because when we come here we are nourished, feed from a single cup or source.

So what you’ve made here today with your individual efforts is a coloring of the cup that nourishes – the symbol of our faith. Each of you work independently, but by putting together your efforts you made something larger and greater than any one of us – and that’s as good a definition of church as you’ll probably ever get.

Gilgamesh: The Oldest Religious Hero

© Davidson Loehr

February 26, 2006

First UU Church of Austin

4700 Grover Ave., Austin, TX 78756

www.austinuu.org

Listen to the sermon by clicking the play button below.

PRAYER:

Let us seek our fullest humanity. We may be about 1/3 beast, 1/3 human and 1/3 divine, but none of the three parts is whole enough, or wise enough, to guide us.

Let us try to become integrated in every way – all our parts, all our people, are the necessary elements of our fullest humanity, and our most complete strength.

The excellence we seek is a fragile, beautiful thing. We seek the ability to live our passing lives, alive with awareness and compassion, excited by the human-scale joys that come from fully participating in the passing but precious splendor of people who have come alive to the challenges of life and the joy of living them.

As the theologian Howard Thurman has said, “Let us find what makes us come most fully alive, and go do it – because what the world most needs is people who have come alive.”

Amen.

SERMON: Gilgamesh, the Oldest Spiritual Hero

One of the ironies of religion is that we go to our faith traditions to seek what we feel are the most important truths – the truths we should guide our lives by – but what we mostly do is tell stories. Those stories can structure our lives, determine how we live, what we take to be sacred. Yet, at bottom, they’re stories. And if we change our stories, it can change our life. That’s what a conversion experience is about: changing your center to live out of a new story.

In Western religion, we’re trained to explore and interpret stories from the Bible for insights into reality, ethics, etc. In Hindu countries, they don’t use the Bible, but use the many stories in their Mahabharata and Ramayana stories, and some of the philosophical writings like the Upanishads, etc.

Like the Hindus, the ancient Greeks used lots of gods, while the Buddhists used stories without any gods at all.

But for most of us, religion is about forming the right kind of relationship with God, much as subjects form a relationship with their master. Not to care about God is seen as not caring about life, goodness, character or ethics – and, of course, our eternal future for most of those in Western religions. For this God controls eternal damnation or reward, though the terms of it are made by the priests and rulers, since this God, like all gods, isn’t really part of our world except through the stories about him.

But long before the Hebrews, long before the Greeks, over 1500 years before the Hindus, there was an earlier high civilization in Sumer, with a very different kind of story about life, the gods and immortality.

It is the epic of Gilgamesh. It was only unearthed and translated in the 19th and early 20th centuries. I don’t think you can overstate just how deeply different and disturbing it is to all Western religious thought. First, it disturbed Western thinkers because it contains the ancient story of a flood, and a couple who made an ark to survive it, told centuries before the Genesis story and generally accepted as the main source of the story of Noah and his ark.

That was in the 1870s. But by the 1890s, some scholars were making far bolder claims. They said this myth is not only older than the Bible, but also better than the Bible, that it was a mythology to which we could relate more naturally in our modern world.

So this morning, I want to introduce you to this story that’s older than all of the world’s religions, older than all their gods, and explore a little of what it’s saying, and why it may well fit our modern world better.

Ironically, even the Gilgamesh story seems to be claiming that their modern world is no longer served by the ancient world of gods and stories of immortality. Their central concern is with the reality of death, and the stories of immortality, which they finally reject as belonging to ancient times, but not their modern age.

Gilgamesh was a historical figure, from the dawn of our recorded human history. He ruled about 4600 years ago in the city of Uruk in what is now southern Iraq. He was an ancient Sumerian. He knew he was a Sumerian, but he did not know that he was ancient. In fact, he saw himself as very modern. He lived about two centuries after the Sumerians had been the first to invent writing, so they rightly felt that they were far more advanced than any people who had ever lived before them.

In the century after his death, the historical memory of this ruler was transformed into myth. At first, his story was recorded in a series of short poems. 1,000 years later, these stories were woven into an epic, and became known throughout the near East.

Thousands of fragments of this epic have been recovered, and we have about 3,000 lines of this story, which achieved its final form around 1300 BC.

The two main characters in the story are Gilgamesh, who is described as 2/3 divine and 1/3 human, and Enkidu, a kind of mirror image, who seems about 1/3 human and 2/3 animal.

Enkidu was created as a kind of wild anti-hero to Gilgamesh, as his opposite. Gilgamesh sent a woman out into the woods to tame him. Enkidu stays with her for just a week, and is transformed into someone human and urban. I know women who hear this and think doing that in a year, let alone a week, would be a miracle, though I don’t know too many men who think so.

Once he becomes more human, Enkidu challenges and fights with Gilgamesh, and it’s a draw: they’ve met their match, their shadow side, their complement. They become companions, and friends. It was through this bond with his complement that Gilgamesh first learned true friendship – and some of the modern psychological readings of that seem pretty obvious.

Together, they go to kill an evil monster that belongs to the gods, to prove themselves more powerful. And they are: together, they can defeat evil.

The great goddess Ishtar wants Gilgamesh to marry her, and promises him love and peace – she is the goddess of love, fruitfulness and war. But he isn’t interested, says her love leads only to war, and recounts many stories of how she has betrayed her lovers. She is furious, and sends the bull of heaven to kill them both. But Enkidu kills the mighty bull of heaven.

Here are men – or one man who has integrated his animal, human and divine natures – with no fear of the ancient supernatural powers. In fact, they can hold their own against them, and defeat most of them. I don’t know of another religious tradition with such a story.

Enkidu, however, dies from wounds suffered in the fights with the supernatural monsters – at least partly as retribution demanded by the gods for their destruction of the Bull of Heaven – and Gilgamesh discovers loss, grief, and death.

Gilgamesh now roams the earth wondering if it’s possible to avoid death. He finds the old Noah-type figure (Utnapishtim) who, with his wife who survived the great flood, were granted immortality.

Utnapishtim says he was warned by the gods of the flood, so he, his wife and artisans built and survived on the ark. But he says this cannot happen again, and the gods’ granting of immortality was a one-time deal, long ago but not in modern times.

Gilgamesh still wants to gain immortality. As he prepares to leave, the old Noah tells him of the plant growing at the bottom of the sea, called “the old one becomes a child,” and says if Gilgamesh uses it, he won’t grow old. Gilgamesh finds the plant and is going to use it. (This is like taking a pill to solve the problem.) But the plant falls into the water, and a snake steals it, which is why snakes can renew their skin.

You might ask, “Well, what would have happened if Gilgamesh had eaten that plant?” The answer is that then he would have to have discovered, either that the plant didn’t work or that he did something wrong, and lost his only chance at it. Because the story, remember, was written by people who knew that we don’t have immortality, and wrote an imaginative story to say that there are irreversible reasons why we don’t and can’t.

So Gilgamesh knows that he can neither get the cure or the pill, and has accepted that the quest for immortality is in vain.

Now Gilgamesh confronts reality anew. This is his conversion experience, and it changes everything. Here was his spiritual journey:

1. First, he seeks the cure for the fact that we must die – having the gods grant immortality. But that doesn’t happen any more; the gods are useless for this. And even Ushnapishtim, the last human to become immortal, is lonely and grieves for his lost son, so immortality can’t be the answer to human yearning anyway.

2. Then he wants a “pill” – a magic way, not involving the gods, to become immortal, to eat of the plant called “he who is old becomes young again.” But that also only worked once, with the snake, and isn’t available in his modern times.

3. Finally, he understands that neither gods nor natural routes can lead us beyond the fact that we’re born, we live, and we die and become part of the world of the irretrievably dead. Even kings die: even the rich, even the talented, even us.

4. What, then, does the human condition offer? What is a reality-based solution to this longing? Many things. Friendship, sex, relationships, families, children who survive us, the fact that we can memorialize friends, heroes, beloved people – and that we can aspire to become a memorable person. We can achieve things that will live on in the memory of others. We can build things. We are part of cities and states that live on and carry our passions and memories and the tales of our deeds forward.

When we integrate our animal, human and divine aspects, we have great power; we can even destroy evil. And that’s a good thing. Even when gods send the evil against us, we can destroy it. Still, we die.

The Gilgamesh story is saying that the gift of immortality, either from the gods or from a “pill,” belonged to the mythic past, not the reality-based present. Whether it once happened in stories, it doesn’t matter because it doesn’t happen now; it isn’t the reality in which we live.

How is this good news? Because it empowers us in the real world. If we enter the fantasy worlds, we’re subject to those who control the stories, but who have no real information that we don’t have: just stories.

Gods have their own rules. We need a world with human-sized rules and dependable friendship and love, not subject to the whims of gods who wouldn’t care about us. And we don’t need the gods – we can simply refuse to deal with them (Ishtar), or make perfunctory bribes to them (Shamash) without caring about them.

We can live a human-scale life. We lose good friends, we lose those we love, but can memorialize them, tell their stories, write poems, build statues. We can create families, cities, and seek to become a memorable person in the lives of others.

Like one of our own modern authors (Borges) has said, we die twice. The first time is when our body gives out. Then the second and final death comes when there is no one left to tell our story. Gilgamesh accepted the first death, but said the human condition offers us chances to postpone the second death through telling our stories, writing poems, epics, memorializing those who have mattered to us, building families, cities, and participating in the joys of this fragile, transient, precious life.

The goal of human life is not absorption into the moment like other animals, and not an immortality that would breed indifference to transient things, like the gods we have sanctioned. What is available to humans is an excellence located between the beasts and the gods, and available to neither of them. It consists of participation in life, joy, creativity and wisdom.

So the gods prove to be useless, and Gilgamesh must learn to deal with life and the world the way they really are in these modern times of 4600 years ago. This isn’t atheism, it’s growing past the time when it was useful to think in terms of gods; it’s outgrowing the gods by coming into our full humanity.

What, then, is the “divine” part of us? We don’t share the gods’ immortality, or their aloofness to human pains. Perhaps it is our imagination, our ability to gain a kind of fragile wisdom available neither to animals nor gods. Gods don’t need wisdom, animals don’t either: they are living too much in the present to need a perspective that can reach beyond the present.

And what is wisdom? Perhaps it’s dealing with the fact that we live, love and will die, in ways that can lead us to that lost Atlantis of the coordinated soul and a more integrated and authentic existence that magnifies our life force rather than dissipating it. The love of gods who don’t live within our human constraints isn’t helpful, precisely because they don’t empathize with our limitations.

What is essential about human excellence is precisely its fragility. We who live and will die nevertheless love, make friendships, build cities, find joy, create children and invest our love and lives in them. We can watch them grow, as we also grow through the stages of life. Gods can’t do that. But like the gods, our imaginations can range far beyond us: that’s the “divine” part of us. We can create things that were not there, that are tender, beautiful, precious and passing, as we also are. Gilgamesh chooses this fully human and participatory life over gods and immortality.

Nearly two thousand years later, in Homer’s Odyssey Odysseus will also choose his wife Penelope over an immortal existence with the goddess Circe. These choices of the human over the immortal are rare in world literature, and among our most courageous and hopeful stories.

After all, as Gilgamesh might have said, he was a modern man, and nostalgia for the ancient ways no longer serves us. It is time to grow up, time to grow beyond the gods and into our full humanity which is, in its way, even better than the gods.

Listening to Hearts

© Davidson Loehr

February 19, 2006

First UU Church of Austin

4700 Grover Ave., Austin, TX 78756

www.austinuu.org

Listen to the sermon by clicking the play button.

PRAYER:

Let us be willing to listen to our hearts when we are in pain. Not our anger, not our complaints, not our fear or the litany of life’s failings, but the still, small voices of our hearts.

Sometimes, it is the wishes of our hearts that cause our pain, when we expect the world to grant those wishes.

Let us not go through it alone unless we have to. Let us find a safe place, a safe person, and ask them to listen, as we try to listen, to the cries of our hurts and of our hearts.

Whether things around us can be changed, or we’ll have to change our demands and expectations, it often starts with the painful honesty that can say, “This is not what I expected in my life.”

Some times the wisdom we need is just what we don’t want to hear, but what we need to hear – not from others wagging their self-righteous fingers at us, but from ourselves, in our own voice.

Religious miracles aren’t about changing the world around us. Those are social or political endeavors. Religious miracles are about changing our hearts, our expectations, changing what we are willing to accept.

They are among life’s hardest miracles, and they seldom happen alone. When we are in pain, when we need someone just to listen, let us try to find them.

The heart does have reasons that reason does not know. And sometimes, if we will listen carefully, we can hear them. Let us learn to listen.

Amen.

TESTIMONIALS

This service about “listening to the heart” used our own Listening Ministry as an example of church members who have been through nearly six months of training as listeners, and church members who have used these services. For this posting, I’ve removed the last names of our members, but included their comments.

Mike – A Listening Minister:

1. What was the best thing about the listening ministry program?

One of the best things about the Listening Ministry program for me is the training. In the beginning it’s a frustrating and unnatural process, but it gets you thinking. You think about listening, which is unnatural, because most of us listen in order to respond with answers or anecdotes. As a listening minister you learn to respond with questions, to clarify, or by paraphrasing, to comprehend.

The training by itself is good enough. I’d do it again just for that. But, I joined this church for many reasons. One reason is for community, another is for personal salvation. By salvation I mean that I want to live a healthy life in the moment. For me, the two are joined.

A perfect illustration of this for me started in the New UU Covenant group. Everyone in the group gave a talk that summed up their personal spiritual journey. Well, I grew up fairly un-churched. Our family suited-up for Easter or Christmas Eve services at a mild Presbyterian church. I couldn’t tell you anything about it really-other than feeling awkward and stiff in church clothes. So, for this covenant group, I wrote about my life-the emotional ups and downs, the demons, the struggle to forgive myself and others. Before I spilled all of this out in the covenant group, I confessed that I’d written a rather long piece on my spiritual journey. The leader of the group, Nancy G., said quite seriously something to the effect: Take as long as you need, we’re here for you.

We all start coming to church for one reason or the other, but I personally returned to this church for the gentle inclusiveness found in Nancy’s words and in that group’s willingness to listen to my story. This to me embodies one of the listening ministry principles. Bearing witness. Everyone needs a witness to the ups and downs in their lives. At times, friends, family, and co-workers cannot fulfill this role. Sometimes you just need a neutral person to listen respectfully with compassion to your story. You need a witness. I believe that being heard, no matter what you’re suffering, can help with the healing process.

 

Dana – who used our Listening Ministry:

1. What was the best thing about your listener or the listening ministry program?

Having someone listen without judgment or “helpful” comments. Simply allowing the words from my pain resonate in the room and echo back to my ears. This echo came back to me with acknowledgement, affirmation and confirmation of my feelings. The listening minister likewise, reiterated my feelings, and somehow my feelings were annotated and enlarged, no longer being fuzzy thoughts are hurts… But a solid that could be seen and managed.

2. What would you tell someone who was hesitant to call for a listening minister?

That managing pain alone is a choice, but not the most effective and beneficial. Sharing pain as in sharing joy, a good meal, a good laugh, brings an expanded dimension and allows space for healing….That being heard by someone who can hear, is sensitive and supportive is the very best to bring about resolution.

3. What surprised you most about the listening ministry?

The ease, simplicity, of someone accommodating my time schedule, being available to me, to be with me, and support me in finding positive resolution to my issues.

Caroline – A Listening Minister

I signed up for the LM training soon after joining the church. The training required introspection, openness and sharing among other trainees. This continues throughout one’s participation in the program. Serving as a LM has helped me understand why I respond to situations as I do, what I’m feeling and why, and how to better put it into words – not a forte of mine. So I have learned both from my listenees and my fellow LM”s. Another benefit, I have also come to know quite well a caring, open, diverse group of church members whom I care about greatly. Six of the trainees from my group still get together on a monthly basis. I cherish these get-togethers.

For someone who is hesitant to request a LM, I would say think of it as your time, a time when you give yourself permission to talk about what is on your mind without worrying about whether you are imposing on the listener. The old saying “get it off your chest” works: talking something through in your head is harder. Situations are clarified, emotions may not have the same grip once they are spoken. New perspectives and insights emerge.

The LM is a real win-win situation as far as I’m concerned. I have gained as much from my listenees and the program as they I hope have.

 

Rebecca – who used our Listening Ministry:

1. What was the best thing about your listener or the listening ministry program?

I liked that my listener had some experience with my specific issue. It made me feel like she would understand my problems from the start.

2. What would you tell someone who was hesitant to call for a listening minister?

I found it to be very effective one on one counseling for a time that was difficult. My listener gave support that I was not able to find in friends or family.

3. What surprised you most about the listening ministry?

How helpful it was. She just listened to me spew out all of my stuff. She never really gave advice or guidance. She just accepted me in the place I was in. It’s a world full of judgments but it’s a very powerful thing to just be accepted.

SERMON:

When I looked for a training program for a listening ministry program after I arrived here in 2000, I chose the one we’re using for two reasons. First, it was the hardest and demanded the most training, and I thought both our members and our volunteers deserve that kind of first-class treatment.

And second, I liked the philosophy of this training, which saw our role not as curing, not as solving, but as listening, in the faith that the wisdom most of us need is the wisdom of our own best selves, and that can happen – sometimes almost magically – just by being able to tell our story. Listening is work, always, and it’s hard work. But when one person can be honest and the other can be attentive, sometimes miracles occur.

I first saw this magic performed twenty-four years ago, and to the end of my days it will remain one of the most miraculous things I have ever witnessed.

I was taking a ten-week chaplaincy training program at Northwestern Memorial Hospital in downtown Chicago, learning how to be a chaplain, which I finally realized meant learning how to listen. I had signed on for the leukemia ward. As soon as I found the ward and told them I was the new chaplain intern, three nurses jumped on me and said “Wonderful! It’s your turn! Go see the woman in room 19!” I asked what this was about, and they said “We have all had all we can take of her. It’s your turn!”

I went in to meet this woman, and a nurse closed the door behind me. The patient was 29, married with two children, dying of leukemia, and furious. I heard her whole story: very loud, punctuated with furious profanity, along with being told that the fact that I dared to be a chaplain was a cheap abomination, because in case I hadn’t heard, there was no God, there was no justice, and there was no love!

I have never been around anyone as deeply furious, or loud, profane and vulgar as this woman, and I had no idea how to help her. I listened to her story. She and her husband had had a stormy beginning to their marriage, with some painful fights and threats of divorce going both ways. Then one day they decided to begin talking through their angers and their differences. They worked hard at it for a year, she said. They were vulnerable, honest, and serious. They were willing to be heard, and willing to listen.

And finally, as they could hear each other’s pain and anger, they began to understand where the resentments were, how the angers had arisen and how they had each nursed them in the dark, where they gained strength until they had nearly destroyed their relationship.

Slowly, painfully, they found each other again, and they found the love they had lost. They fell in love all over again, with each other, with their marriage and their new baby. They recommitted themselves to one another for the rest of their lives, and soon their second child was on the way.

The past three years, she said, had been the happiest either of them had ever imagined. They had worked for it, they had earned it, they deserved it. There was a justice about it – this was a very important phrase for her.

And now, she said, her voice rising again, she was going to die. She was going to die, leaving behind the husband she loved, the two young children they both loved and had so looked forward to spending the rest of their lives raising and loving and watching grow up.

Within seconds, the profanity and vulgarity were back, screamed almost as loud as she could scream from her desperate, hopeless pain. I had absolutely no idea what to do. After she finished, she told me that I was to return at the same time the next day. I asked why. She screamed that I would hear this story every damned day until she died, that’s why, and if I wasn’t there she would have me paged.

I had failed miserably with the very first patient to whom I’d been assigned. I felt awful, and I was in that room at that time for five full days, feeling worse for her and worse for myself every day.

I was depressed all that weekend, and partly because I knew Monday was coming and I’d have to go back into that room again. So Monday morning, in the group when the ten chaplain students met with our supervisor, I confessed. I told the story, said I had completely failed at this, and didn’t know what to do.

Our supervisor was a Lutheran minister named John Serkland – good people deserve to have their names told with their stories. John listened to my miserable story, and said “Do you want me to save you?” I said “Do you honestly think you can?” He said Yes, he thought he probably could. I couldn’t believe it. I didn’t even know what that could mean. I said “John, this woman is going to die, she’s furious and I don’t blame her. What on earth can you possibly do?” He said that tomorrow he would go with me to visit her.

So that day, Monday, I spent another painful and miserable fifteen minutes in her room, hearing the same story, with more volume, more profanity, more vulgarity, more hopeless fury, and that night I didn’t sleep well.

The next day, John wore his chaplain costume, with the Lutheran backward collar. I thought, Man, she’s going to throw the bedstand at you in that costume! That afternoon, we walked into her room. She took one quick look at us, and sized the situation up immediately. “Oh I see,” she yelled, “the little moron is stumped, so he brings the big fat moron!” Her actual words were far more colorful,

John sat down in the chair by the head of her bed. He said, “My name is John. May I hear your story?” That’s all he said for the next ten minutes. She laid into him. She called him names, told him what an abomination his costume was, then told him her story, the story I had already heard six times. It seemed even more angry, more desperate, more hopeless. When she finished, John said just three words. He looked at her and simply said, “You expected more.”

She was prepared to throw whatever he said right back in his face, and she formed her mouth for a response, but nothing came out. She mustered more energy, more anger, and again tried to say something, but again nothing came out. Then tears ran down both her cheeks; she looked at John and simply said, “Yes.”

“Yes,” he repeated. She reached her hand out, and he clasped it for a few seconds, then said “I would like to come back tomorrow.” She nodded. We left.

The next day, we returned, and the spell had been broken. She apologized for her behavior, her anger, her language, and John said she had nothing to apologize for. “I expected more,” she said, “I expected more than this. But there isn’t more. There’s just this. Just 29 years. Just this. I was just so angry! I didn’t know what to do. It didn’t seem right. There was no justice in it. I wanted more. But there isn’t more. There is just this.” She thanked John, then said “You don’t have to come back.” She nodded toward me and said, “He’ll do.” We laughed, and left.

John and I went to the hospital cafeteria for some coffee and conversation. I said “How did you know what to do?” He said, “I have a confession to make. About ten years ago, I was assigned to a patient much like her, in the same condition, and she was also furious. Each day she would scream at me, call me names, tell me chaplains were a disgrace, and the rest of it. I had no idea what to do. I kept wanting to help her, to solve her problem, and I couldn’t solve her problem because she was right: she was dying, and it wasn’t fair. She died, angry to the end, and I knew I had failed her. I thought about it for years. A couple years ago, after I’d had a lot more experience, I finally realized that I hadn’t needed to fix her, I’d just needed to hear her. I wondered if I would ever get another chance to do it right. This time, it was your turn. And because you failed as I once had, I got the chance to say those three words I wish I had said ten years ago.”

All John did was listen to her heart. It was all she needed. Most of the time, it’s all any of us need. It’s our own wisdom that we need, but we can’t hear it because our fear, our desperation and our fury keep us from hearing ourselves. Sometimes, it just takes someone else. Not someone to fix us, not someone to give us wise answers like dishing out pills. Not someone to listen to our symptoms and diagnose a medication. Just someone to listen to our heart. Just that.

And what a gift it is. That young woman died a few weeks later. During those weeks, she spent every minute she could loving her husband, her children, expressing her appreciation for all that others had been able to do. She had found a peace I didn’t think possible. It was certainly a peace I couldn’t have led her to. But she didn’t need to be led; she just needed to be heard – and to listen to herself.

Of all the thoughts I’ve had about that experience, two stand out.

The first was realizing that virtually all of our frustrations, angers and disappointments in life result from the fact that we expected more. Our friendships or relationships aren’t as satisfying as we want: we expected more. Our parents, our families, frustrate us with their scripts, their expectations, their badgering. We expected more from our family. Our job drives us nuts: we expected more from that! We’re not attractive enough, not successful enough, not happy enough: we expected more.

Sometimes, of course, there can be more. Every social action, every political action effort in history has been the demand that our society be more. The American colonists expected more representation for their taxes, demanded it, fought for it, and got it. A century ago, women expected more of a voice in elections. They fought for it, and got it. The civil rights movement, the Vietnam era anti-war movement, the movement to remove President Nixon from office, and hundreds of other movements came precisely from the fact that we expected more, worked for more, and got more. So this isn’t about urging a spineless passivity. Some things can be changed.

But not everything can be changed. Some things must finally be accepted. Then it’s time to look for spiritual miracles. Those miracles don’t change the world around us; they change the world within us. That’s what religious miracles are about: not walking on water, but learning to walk on the earth for as long as we”ve been given: awake, aware, and grateful.

The second lesson I learned is that it usually won’t happen unless we can listen and hear. Not only chaplains, ministers and listening ministers need to listen and hear, but those telling their stories need to listen and hear, too. I don’t know how many times that woman shouted her story, but she never heard what her heart was saying, and she put others off so much that they didn’t even want to listen. If both she and John had not been willing to listen to her heart, I think she would have died in that same painful fury.

When we can get our hearts and our heads together and listen, sometimes miracles happen. They really happen every day, all around us, in quiet conversations and quiet reflections going on everywhere. Life can have profound disappointments, but it also has its miracles. Indeed, miracles abound. Sometimes all we have to do is listen.

Demons of the Heart

© Davidson Loehr

February 12, 2006

First UU Church of Austin

4700 Grover Ave., Austin, TX 78756

www.austinuu.org

AFFIRMATION OF FAITH:

Eric Hepburn, Worship Associate

The year is 1948, India has just won independence from the British Empire on the strength of a massive campaign of non-violent civil resistance. However, in the wake of this victory comes the separation of India and Pakistan along religious lines. Hindus and Muslims violently clash as the harsh realities of separating a people set in.

Amidst this chaos, Mohandas K. Gandhi, plans a peace mission to Pakistan to plead for the reunification of India. In an interview with Margaret Bourke White he says of his planned journey, “I am simply going to prove, to Hindus here and Muslims there, that the only devils in the world are those running “round in our own hearts, and that is where all our battles ought to be fought”

Miss White asks, “So what kind of warrior have you been, in that warfare?”

Gandhi replies, “Not a very good one. That is why I have so much tolerance for the other scoundrels of the world.”

Shortly thereafter, Gandhi was assassinated by a Hindu extremist during a prayer meeting in his own garden.

The only devils in the world are those running “round in our own hearts. And that is where all of our battles ought to be fought

I believe that this is profoundly true. It is for me, an article of faith and a cornerstone of compassion. We, all of us, all the brothers and sisters of humanity, share the same devils, and for each of us they reside in the same place. In here (gesture to heart).

I struggle against these devils, against greed, and against hate, and against delusion. I struggle against them the same as you do, the same as everybody else does.

And when one of my brothers or one of my sisters succumbs to one of these devils, I am filled with sadness. When one of my brothers raises a hand in violence, I am filled with grief. When one of my sisters takes more than her share, I am filled with disappointment. When I act on the behest of any one of these devils, any one that is not among the better angels of our nature, then I am filled with remorse.

And the devils know, they know when we are grieving, when we are remorseful, when we are feeling bad about ourselves and our brothers and sisters. It is then, that they come again. Spurring us to feel hate against our brother who suffers already from his violence, spurring us to feel greed towards the possession of our sister who already suffers from her attachment, spurring us to delude ourselves that our actions were not the result of low motives.

So this is my article of faith, to have compassion for myself, to have compassion for my brothers and sisters, by believing that these devils are not US, that they are not inevitable, that they are not part of the world outside, but part of the world inside of each of us.

PRAYER

Let us help one another in facing the demons of our hearts. Those dark feelings, the selfish impulses that tell us we can take what we want and treat those who get in our way merely as obstacles rather than as our brothers and sisters. These are the demons of our hearts, and they are hard to face alone.

We are all guilty. We have all done things to others we should not have done. We have all refrained from doing things for others that we should have done. We were listening to the wrong voices. We didn’t hear the voices of understanding and compassion because we were too full of what we wanted.

And so we have committed sins of commission and sins of omission, and have not been our best selves, either alone or as a nation.

For on a national level, we also need help in facing the demons of our hearts. There too, we have plundered others, as though their only purpose was to provide us with cheap oil, cheap labor, even cheap thrills of torture and humiliation, at Abu Graib and other hell-holes.

Both angels and demons reside in us as possibilities, but we must choose wisely, or the wrong choices may be made for us by others. It takes courage to choose wisely. It also takes vision.

Let us strive for the vision to see who we are as individuals and as a society, and the courage to change into who we would be more proud to become. Demons, like evil, love the dark. Let us shed light on our demons, that we may begin to expel them. It is a brave prayer, and we offer it with both trepidation and resolve. Amen.

SERMON: Demons of the Heart

I believe in demons. I believe in good spirits, too, but also demons: selfish spirits, dynamics that are destructive to others, even to life.

If “angels” are messengers from our better nature, demons are their shadow side: the messengers from those selfish parts that have always been with us as well, hiding right there in our hearts.

This morning, I want to talk about some of these demons. I want to talk about the scripts, the demons, directing and defining who we are and what forces seem to be loose among us and growing in strength, at least abroad.

A year ago, I read a new book about these demons. The author is confessing his role as one of those who served the greedy interests. The book is called Confessions of an Economic Hit Man, by John Perkins. I’m surprised that it’s been a year since I read the book, because I remember thinking that I needed to preach on this immediately. Perhaps I didn’t want to acknowledge some of these things either.

The book is a confession. For over ten years, Perkins was an economic hit man, and he describes the plan in great and disturbing detail – and even hints at bigger and more current places in our own country where these demons have operated.

To cut to the chase, an economic hit man is an economist employed through a consulting firm paid by major corporations, but working hand in hand with the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund and the U.S. government, to reshape the economic profile of the world in ways that benefit us at the expense of everyone else. It is an attempt to dominate the world, one economy at a time.

When a country has oil, cheap labor or strategic location we want, some of these economists do a study to prove to the leaders of the target country that they are on the verge of a huge bonanza from oil or exports, that could make an unbelievable amount of money – figures they often used were a 15% return on investment for the next 25 years. It’s the chance of a lifetime.

Normally, they said we wouldn’t much care what happened to your little country. But with that kind of money to be made, a lot of people would be willing to invest in it. And the World Bank and International Monetary Fund might well even be willing to provide loans.

The loans are necessary, very big loans. Because before this country can take advantage of the bonanza that awaits them, they must develop infrastructure: roads, electricity, water facilities and so on. That’s expensive, and not the sort of work they’re able to do. However, there are corporations in the US that can and will do all the work to give them their needed infrastructure, and it can all be paid for with the loans from the World Bank. The corporations include Bechtel, Haliburton, and other big ones you may have heard of. So most of the money never leaves the U.S.

If the economic hit men are persuasive enough, the country takes the loans. Yet without exception, the bonanza never turns out to have been there after all, and the country always defaults on the loans. That’s not a failure; it’s how the plan is supposed to work.

An Economic Hit Man’s (EHM) job is “to encourage world leaders to become part of a vast network that promotes U.S. commercial interests. In the end, those leaders become ensnared in a web of debt that ensures their loyalty. We can draw on them whenever we desire – to satisfy our political, economic, or military needs. In turn, they bolster their political positions by bringing industrial parks, power plants, and airports to their people. The owners of U.S. engineering/construction companies become fabulously wealthy.” (xi) And the foreign leaders also become wealthy by selling out everyone else in their country. In fact, this whole scheme depends on finding a few leaders who are willing to get very rich by selling out everyone else. History seems to show an unending supply of such people, in all countries.

While hit men worked in many countries, Ecuador provides a typical and revealing case of what happens.

Because of the work of John Perkins and other Economic Hit Men, he says, “Ecuador is in far worse shape today than she was before we introduced her to the miracles of modern economics, banking, and engineering. Since 1970, during this period known euphemistically as the Oil Boom, the official poverty level grew from 50 to 70 percent, under- or unemployment increased from 15 to 70 percent, and public debt increased from $240 million to $16 billion. Meanwhile, the share of national resources allocated to the poorest segments of the population declined from 20 to 6 percent. (xviii)

“Nearly every country brought under the global empire’s umbrella has suffered a similar fate. Third world debt has grown to more than $2.5 trillion, and the cost of servicing it – over $375 billion per year as of 2004 – is more than all third world spending on health and education, and twenty times what developing countries receive annually in foreign aid. Over half the people in the world survive on less than two dollars per day, which is roughly the same amount they received in the early 1970s. Meanwhile, the top 1 percent of third world households account for 70 to 90 percent of all private financial wealth and real estate ownership in their country. (xix) – much as they are beginning to do in the U.S.

“For every $100 of crude oil taken out of the Ecuadorian rain forests, the oil companies receive $75. Of the remaining $25, three-quarters must go to paying off the foreign debt. Most of the remainder covers military and other government expenses – which leaves about $2.50 for health, education, and programs aimed at helping the poor. Thus, out of every $100 worth of oil torn from the Amazon, less than $3 goes to the people who need the money most, those whose lives have been so adversely impacted by the dams, the drilling, and the pipelines, and who are dying from lack of edible food and potable water. (xx) And yet, among the options facing the targeted countries, the Economic Hit Men are the kindest.

When they fail, an even more sinister breed steps in, known as the jackals. “The jackals are always there, lurking in the shadows. When they emerge, heads of state are overthrown or die in violent “accidents.” And if by chance the jackals fail, as they failed in Panama, Afghanistan and Iraq, then the old models resurface. When the jackals fail, young American soldiers are sent in to kill and to die.” (xxi)

So first, the false economists are sent in to trick the country’s leaders. If they fail, the jackals, the older-style hit men, are sent in to kill the leader, as we did with Allende in Chili, Roldos in Ecuador, Torrijos in Panama and others. And if the hit men fail, our military forces invade the country, as we invaded Panama to kidnap its leader, and as we invaded Iraq, twice.

Some of the major corporations that pull the strings to make this scheme work include United Fruit Co. (owned by George HW Bush), Bechtel and Halliburton. (73) When Perkins worked this scheme, Bechtel’s president was George Shultz, Nixon’s Secretary of Labor. And Bechtel was loaded with Nixon, Ford, and Bush cronies. (74) Today, we know that Dick Cheney was CEO of Halliburton before becoming Vice President.

Religion is involved in these demonic activities, as well. And Perkins talks about how a front organization called the Summer Institute of Linguistics, an evangelical missionary group from the US, was in collusion with the oil companies. The organization had entered Ecuador, as it had so many other countries, under the pretext of studying, recording, and translating indigenous languages.

But whenever seismologists reported to corporate headquarters that a certain region had characteristics indicating a high probability of oil beneath the surface, SIL went in and encouraged the indigenous people to move from that land, onto missionary reservations; there they would receive free food, shelter, clothes, medical treatment, and missionary-style education. The condition was that they had to deed their lands to the oil companies. (142)

While the sophistication of the economic hit men was new, nothing else about the scheme was, for we have used hit men and soldiers to serve the bidding of large corporations for a century or more.

Seventy-five years ago, General Smedley Butler gave a speech about this to the American Legion convention in Connecticut – later included in his book War is a Racket. The speech was given on August 21, 1931, when he said:

“I spent 33 years – being a high-class muscle man for Big Business, for Wall Street and the bankers. In short, I was a racketeer for capitalism”.

“I helped purify Nicaragua for the international banking house of Brown Brothers in 1909-1912. I helped make Mexico and especially Tampico safe for American oil interests in 1916. I brought light to the Dominican Republic for American sugar interests in 1916. I helped make Haiti and Cuba a decent place for the National City [Bank] boys to collect revenue in. I helped in the rape of half a dozen Central American republics for the benefit of Wall Street”.

“In China in 1927 I helped see to it that Standard Oil went its way unmolested”. I had – a swell racket. I was rewarded with honors, medals, promotions”. I might have given Al Capone a few hints. The best he could do was to operate a racket in three cities. The Marines operated on three continents.” (from Joel Bakan’s The Corporation, p. 93)

An EHM Failure in Iraq

Perkins wrote his book because after our illegal invasion of Iraq, he again saw Bechtel and Halliburton getting unbid contracts, and realized this was simply part three – the military invasion – of the same scheme he had served for a decade.

We wanted Iraq for many reasons. It is important because of oil, because it controls the most important sources of water in the Middle East, and because of its strategic location. It borders Iran, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Syria and Turkey, and has a coastline on the Persian Gulf. It is within easy missile-striking distance of both Israel and the former Soviet Union. Today, it is common knowledge that whoever controls Iraq holds the key to controlling the Middle East. (184)

By the late 1980s, it was apparent that Saddam was not buying into the EHM scenario. This was a major frustration and a great embarrassment to the first Bush administration. Like Panama, Iraq contributed to George HW Bush’s wimp image. As Bush searched for a way out, Saddam played into his hands. In August 1990, he invaded the oil-rich sheikhdom of Kuwait. Bush responded with a denunciation of Saddam for violating international law, even though it had been less than a year since Bush himself had staged the illegal and unilateral invasion of Panama. (184)

Bill Clinton continued pressuring Saddam into following US interests, by placing the sanctions on Iraq that prevented them from getting the chemicals needed to make their drinking water safe. As a direct result, over a million Iraqis died during the 90s, including over half a million children.

When Bill Clinton’s Secretary of State Madeline Albright was asked about the deaths of those half million children near the end of Clinton’s presidency, she told the press “We think it’s worth it.” In fact, while the two Bushes invaded Iraq, Clinton’s sanctions caused far more deaths than those from both Gulf Wars combined.

Perkins’ revelations are disturbing – as is the fact that he played along for a decade, and benefited financially for years afterwards. The philosophy he’s describing is a brutal one, in which the profits of a few are felt to justify any and all means necessary to get and protect them, including deceit, assassinations, piracy, murder and mass murder. Perhaps we can say, “Well, at least this isn’t our government doing this, just some greedy people.”

But can we really say this? Can you? I don’t think I can. I don’t think that kind of a philosophy can be stopped outside our borders. I think it must continue within our borders, as well.

—————–

When I originally delivered this sermon on 12 February 2006, I had added a section on 9-11, expressing my belief that agencies of our own government had orchestrated the attacks of 9-11. But that suggestion was and is so shocking, so repulsive, that it would take a very convincing exposition to make it at all persuasive, and I didn’t do that. It was a sloppy and slapdash addition that I shouldn’t have tacked on – as several members of my church were quick to point out. During the next two weeks, I removed that section and rewrote it, pretty much from scratch, creating a stand-alone essay. That essay, however, is not a sermon, not about religion, and I’m not comfortable having it on our church’s website. It is a passion from other areas of my life, where I am simply operating as an American citizen, concerned with what has happened to our country.

If interested, you can find that long (11,600 word) essay, titled “The New World Order Story,” online at www.propeace.net and other sites.

I do apologize that this isn’t a proper sermon, and lacks a hopeful ending. But when I delivered this sermon I didn’t see a clear path ahead. Now three weeks later, as I edit it for posting on our church website, I still don’t. It will come, as it always has – but not yet.

The Church vs. The Super Bowl

© Jack Harris-Bonham

February 5, 2006

First UU Church of Austin

4700 Grover Ave., Austin, TX 78756

www.austinuu.org

Listen to the sermon by clicking the play button.

PRAYER

Mystery of many names and mystery beyond all naming, here we are again sitting in the house that speaks of mystery, but does not define it. May we be glad to be a part of a tradition that allows us to think for ourselves, may we remember that it is the rich tradition of these churches, both Unitarian and Universalist, that came together that each would be stronger and each would survive.

And when we remember let us remember that Christianity was a big part of the Universalist movement. That the universalism spoken about in its name was a universalism of grace – a rebellion against the Calvinistic notion that there were only a select few who would be saved and a statement that grace was for everyone in all places, in all times. And these precursors of our tradition go all the way back to the middle ages when there was a hue and cry for the Holy scriptures to be translated into the vernacular. Yet, those who so protested and changed things did not do so to dissipate faith, but rather to deepen it.

Now we would remember all those who have come here today in search of answers, in search of questions, in search of comfort. Let their very presence in this assembly be the balm they need, let the communal energy of this sanctuary bask them in love, understanding and companionship.

Let us now remember that there is a world much larger than this community. A world so torn by strife, war, famine and disease that it hardly seems fair for us to be in despair over anything.

Yet the human spirit is one that continually strives for better and more. May we, this morning, consider our blessings, consider our wealth – monetary, spiritual and emotional – and let us find the space to rejoice.

Rejoice that we have enough, rejoice that enough is enough and finally rejoice for the sheer sake of rejoicing. We pray all this in the name of everything that is holy and that is, precisely, everything.

Amen.

SERMON

The Tony and Pulitzer Prize winning playwright, David Mamet, says, (quote) “Only two legitimate national holidays remain. By “legitimate” holidays, I mean this: holidays with a specific, naturally evolved meaning, the celebration of which we find refreshing and correct, and in the celebration of which we, as a people, are united. Those holidays are the Academy Awards and the Super Bowl.”

Our Middle English word, sacred, comes from the Old French, sacer, which means; dedicated, holy, sacred – set apart – pertaining to religious rites or practices – devoted to a single use.”

Dr. Loehr got an email from a colleague shortly before the Rose Bowl. The colleague wrote, “Now let me get this straight, you’re going to show a football game on the large screen at your church?” Dr. Loehr wrote back, “What is it about the sacred that you don’t understand?

I’m seeing similarities between church and football. The mega churches have noticed this already – why do you think that Fellowhip.com in Dallas is built like a stadium and has a large screen that projects the pastor’s face in 30 foot close-ups? What church will never duplicate is the originality and complexity of how football passes the plate. Heck, I’ve watched Super Bowls just to see the commercials. And halfway through the service we have our centering ceremony, but at a Super Bowl game we are likely to see a portion of the anatomy of a vestal virgin, or what passes as one. Perhaps if the stadium churches get big enough they’ll bring back the lions. That was a big hit at the Roman Coliseum.

But I’ll give the evangelicals their due they do play by the rulebook, that is, the game of religion, the game of church that they are playing has rules. If you’re saved, you win. If you’re not saved – you lose. And it’s not just any old game. Here is probably the only place the evangelicals outdo the NFL. The evangelicals are playing the game of eternity. The saying, “It’s only a game!” hardly applies here. You lose this game, – the game of salvation – you lose forever. The logic of the eternity game turns ordinary folks into people who want to save your soul now that they found peace with Jesus. They become bean counters for Christ. When you say you’re saved, when you say you’ve found Jesus, their score increases. And the rules of the game have been written down in a book, the author of whom just happens to be The Lord God Almighty!

Believe me, they know how the game is played and they know who wins and who loses.

But today we, all of us the evangelicals and liberal religious folks alike, get to practice our religious freedom in this country when we gather around our television sets, put out the sacramental chips and salsa, pop open that beer, near-beer, soda or pop the cork on that fine wine. Yes, we celebrate this naturally evolved meaningful game with bread and wine.

And the church – what does the church have to offer? I am cognizant of the fact that number one: you know what cognizant means and number two: I know that I am addressing the refugees of all the world’s great religions, refugees from all of what the great religious traditions have had to offer are gathered right here in this sanctuary.

So – let’s not kid ourselves – I hate to mix my football and baseball analogies, but hey – the churches struck out hundreds of years ago, but they refuse to leave the plate. Bat in hand the church waits for someone – anyone to play her churchy games.

Football is American. I mean by that, that we in the USA know exactly what we mean when we say American. Americans made this sport. From the Knute to the Gipper to the Super athletes of today, we have molded this sport, we have injected this sport to make it bigger, we have dreamed this sport into being. In a world that seems to fight us at every play we needed a concrete model – a game – in which we could choose clearly delineated sides, and then participate either directly, or by watching the two clearly delineated sides fight for the control over and general misuse of a strangely shaped cylindrical ball filled with air and covered originally by the skin of a pig. This sport was definitely not designed by Jews.

And by picking sides, dressing up and showing up we participate in an all out hour battle for control of this pig’s skin!

If your team brings home the bacon more times than theirs – yours wins. Life is good. But if your team loses – it’s the end of the world, as you know it.

David Mamet again, “The Super Bowl, it seems to me, is a celebration of our national love of invidious comparison.” “Invidious comparison? Are you still with me, Unitarian Universalists?

Invidious – tending to cause ill will or animosity; offensive, yes, yes, the Super Bowl is doubly invidious – it is offensive as well as defensive.

When and if you watch the game this evening you will be participating in a celebration of union – yes, union over diversity, but still union – you will be setting aside, making sacred – you will be practicing religion because you will be answering, or trying to answer the two big religious questions; Who am I? And what am I doing here?

I am a Dallas Cowboy’s fan and what I’m doing here is celebrating the quite human and obvious world-weary fact that the more powerful dominate and that sometimes, but only sometimes, wily, sly and creative can substitute for strength – I will celebrate the clear cut delineations of a game and I will see life, mine and yours, reflected there.

And as I look into the game and see our lives mirrored there what do I see? I see conflict, fear, rage, tumult, but also I see strength, fearlessness, hope, camaraderie, the end of fighting, peace, stillness, brother and sisterhood and finally the exaltation of the most high.

Yet – there is more to this game than meets the eye. This game is classic in a purer sense.

Aristotle supposedly wrote two books on drama. The first is the book of Poetics. It is a study of tragedy. The second book dealt with comedy, and it has been subsequently lost.

No wonder it was lost Aristotle himself says of comedy – and I quote – “Its early stages passed unnoticed, because it was not as yet taken up in a serious manner.” Comedy wasn’t taken seriously; I hate that when that happens.

Aristotle turns around and says this about tragedy and he might as well have been talking about football.

“Tragedy is an imitation not only of a complete action, but also of incidents arousing pity and fear.” Listen the next time a good hit is laid upon a player – the crowd expels air involuntarily (make the sound). It isn’t something they rehearse like a cheer, its visceral – it’s a gut reaction (make the sound again). Aristotle continues, “Such incidents have the very greatest effect on the mind when they occur unexpectedly.” A punt returned 80 yards for a touchdown – a tipped pass bobbled and then pull in by our side – Vince Young glibly side stepping his way into the end zone winning the Rose Bowl with 18 seconds left – hook “em horns! Again, Aristotle, “Such incidents have the very greatest effect on the mind when they occur unexpectedly and at the same time in consequence of one another.” First down followed by second down followed by third down followed by touchdown.

The Super Bowl is not only theatrically tragic – it is great theatrical tragedy. Some would like to say that football is comedic since it is, in fact, a celebration of the winners. But this is not the Greek definition of tragedy and certainly not Aristotle’s. In the Poetics Aristotle says “comedy aims at representing men as worse than in real life, and tragedy better than in actual life.” It doesn’t matter that we celebrate the winner, what matters is that these men are bigger, faster, stronger, meaner and more talented than men in actual life. Do yourself a favor the next time you see a football player in person – collegiate or professional – go and stand beside them. Your spouse, those standing around and yourself will automatically make the necessary invidious comparisons.

In some ways it can be said that football surpasses the actual theatre. In a play there is usually only one protagonist.

In a football game we have each team playing the protagonist and the antagonist simultaneously. In a play such as King Lear who ever roots for Goneril or Regan, the gold digging daughters of King Lear? Compared to football the theatre is two-dimensional.

Aristotle again; “the story – must represent one action, a complete whole, with its several incidents so closely connected that the transposal or withdrawal of any one of them will disjoin and dislocate the whole.”

In football each action has a direct and irrevocable reaction. Cause is followed neatly by effect and each effect engenders a new cause and subsequent effect – provided there is no indisputable video evidence. Each game is perfect unto itself and taking any play from the game would be tantamount to Emperor Franz Joseph’s suggestion to Mozart that the opera was fine, but there were simply too many notes.

No part of the game is irrelevant which is a perfect segue to the church.

The evangelicals – even with their “game of eternity? cannot out spectacle the tragic theatre of the NFL. But where do we stand in all this invidious comparison? Where are we UU’s?

The evangelicals have a saying, “I need a witness!” Are we their witnesses? Is our part of the religious game nothing more than skeptical, talking mirrors? Are all our put downs both explicit and implicit, all our education and degrees but spiteful pedigrees for the judgment game at hand? Is our game of religion just a game of the superiority of intellect? Are we doing something besides looking at the world of evangelical religion and finding it wanting, not satisfactory for our high intellectual, sarcastic and totally invidious tastes? And I realize all my earlier quips concerning the evangelicals fit into this category.

So – the question boils down to this: Does the Unitarian Universalist Association have a game plan? Does the First Unitarian Universalist Church of Austin do we have game plan? And if we do have game – what are the rules? How do we win? What would constitute losing this game?

In the Wizard of Oz we were warned, “Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain.”

As Unitarian Universalists we have paid a great deal of attention to the man behind the screen and some of us have gone behind the curtain into the holy of holies. And what have we found besides our insatiable desire to know?

Dr. Loehr this past Senior Luncheon decried the UUA’s lack of center, their lack of anything that smacks of a truly religious center. As Dr. Loehr is fond of saying, “There is no there, there.” In other words the UUA has no game.

Paradoxically, in the UUA’s efforts to be hip, left of center and politically correct, paradoxically and ironically those who wished to save us by introducing us to ourselves, via the seven principles and a leftist political agenda, ironically and ultimately we have been left in the position of having to define ourselves – who are we? What are we doing here? These are the two great religious questions.

What is holy is the process of life itself. And the process cannot be made into a game because it has no beginning and no perceptible end. Any interruption in the process – any freezing of a stage of the process – any product from the process is itself not holy. One cannot be said to win a process – one can only be two things to the process. We can resist and suffer or we can accept and suffer. Suffering is our lot, but acceptance is like manna from heaven. Acceptance of the ontological process exudes a sacramental value often described as grace. But the question remains how would one, could one, pay homage to a process, celebrate a mystery, participate in the ultimate?

The cathedral is gone and ex cathedra we are free to see all of life as sacred. The task before us is impossible – the tools we have are at best primitive, our swords keep outnumbering our pruning hooks, yet it is we, us – all of us – who are called upon to play the game, to expect grace/manna, to expect nothing else and that gladly, remembering, as Aristotle states in t he Poetics, character may determine the quality of our life but only our actions can prove whether that life is finally happy or wretched.

On my walks with my dogs I often find beautiful shells of varied colors and some with stripes. They were the home of something once – a snail – a slug – life – but that life is no longer occupying that edifice and I can’t help but think of the great cathedrals, temples, synagogues and mosques of the world. The Spirit, the one called Holy, lived there once, or perhaps it was only a magnificent home built to entice the god’s inside?

My father, Jack Sr., felt uncomfortable with the idea of God inside a building – any building.

My father found God in a stubbled field on a crisp November morning with a Browning Over and Under resting easily on his shoulder. No, God didn’t have the Browning that was my dad. There was more grace in Dad’s easy swing to aim and shoot than I’ve ever seen in any preacher. My dad would have liked the cowboy’s prayer.

Lord, I’ve never lived where churches grow,

 I love Creation better as it stood

 That day You finished it so long ago

 And looked upon Your work, and called it good.

 I know that others find You in the light

 That’s sifted down through tinted window panes,

 And yet I seem to feel You near tonight

 In this dim, quiet starlight on the plains.

In the dim, quiet starlight of the hill country we at FUUCA, we refugees from the world’s major religions, are asked to celebrate something that has no perceptible beginning and no perceptible end – we are asked to celebrate the process of life itself – life as something sacred, holy and most high.

We love games, the theatre, movies and novels because limits are set, structure us present and we can hold the magnitude of life in our hand, our head and our hearts.

And yet even refugees must make a camp at the border. And this camp we have chosen to call camp UUA. In order not to be lost in the magnitude we have carved out our corner and declared it a safe zone.

Within this safe zone we are free to believe or not to believe, free to suspend judgment, free to honor life, free to care for those on the margins of society, free to agree to disagree.

Ralph Waldo Emerson in his Harvard Divinity School Address of 1838 said, “Alas for the unhappy man that is called to stand in the pulpit, and not give bread of life.”

So – if you’ve been wondering amidst the football analogies and the laying of Aristotle over the game where the bread of life comes in, or what the good news is, then I will go beyond inductive reasoning, beyond inference and simply tell you.

The game played well within UU campuses like this one is a game of teamwork. The first definition of team is still the harnessing of draft animals to do work. Yes, we can agree to disagree and laugh about it, but at the same time as teammates we must agree to be harnessed to what we see to be the truth. And this truth is not heaven sent. It is rather a truth wrought from life. And this truth that we together as team members, harnessed to one another in a common effort, this truth is nothing more or less than our lives passed through the fires of thought.

We live this game of UUism by never forgetting that what is best gives us to ourselves. The sublime is excited by the great stoical doctrine, know thyself and obey thyself. That, which shows God in us, fortifies us. That, which shows God out of us, makes of us merely receivers of the divine instead of its very source.

Yes, we have game – we are the gamest – we are ready and willing – resolute and brave. We are all children of chance. What we believe may be unexpected, random and unpredictable, but we must never forget that our hearts and minds are open, open to the revelations of life, open to opportunity, open to change, open to life, itself.

There’s only one-way to know process – realize your part in it – that’s what covenant is about – that’s what union is about – that’s what love is about and hopefully, that’s what we at the First Unitarian Universalist Church of Austin are all about.

Forgive Me For Not Talking About Forgiveness

© Jack Harris-Bonham

January 1, 2006

First UU Church of Austin

4700 Grover Ave., Austin, TX 78756

www.austinuu.org

Listen to the sermon by clicking the play button.

PRAYER

Mystery of many names and mystery beyond all naming, we sit here today at the very beginning of a new year.

Whether you believe in cyclical time or the linear version today is a new beginning for all of us. Perhaps it’s time to set down our burdens and examine them. With the weight off our shoulders let’s take a good look at those indispensables that we’ve carted with us for the past umpteen years.

George Carlen says that wherever we go we need to take a little of our stuff with us. Are the burdens you’re been carrying around just too large to be considered a little of your stuff? That argument you had last year – you know the one I mean – the one that was never resolved – the one that still gets replayed in your head first thing every morning.

Perhaps it’s time to bury the hatchet and call that person up and tell them you don’t care who’s right, you just want your friendship restored to its former luster. I’m thinking now of those rooms at the various concentration camps during the Holocaust – those rooms filled with the detritus of a hurried exit – those rooms filled with things that had no life in and of themselves. Holocaust means a whole burning.

Maybe it’s time to burn all the burdens we’ve been carrying all these years. Ask yourself this question, Who am I without these burdens? You might be surprised to find yourself facing a new you.

It’s a new year and a new time to rub the slate of resentments clean. In a hundred years who will know the score you’re keeping? Better to wipe off that slate and use it for a grocery list – at least that would feed you.

And now let us all promise to honor our feelings this coming year – to honor our pain, our anger, our love, our joy, to honor all the feelings that come our way and to stop imagining that we can control any of this thing we call life.

Make us all non-anxious presences in life – create in us the loving space to simply watch and not judge – prepare us to meet life on its own terms, remembering that how we think things should be and how things are rarely line up together.

In the name of everything that is holy and that is, precisely, everything.

Amen

(Text of Carolyn Grimminger’s Affirmation of Faith on forgiveness is not available.)

SERMON

“Frankie and Johnny were lovers. O my Gawd how they did love! They swore to be true to each other, As true as the stars above. He was her man but he done her wrong.”

When I was a bad boy – that is – when I was a practicing alcoholic I did a whole bunch of folks wrong! As a consequence I bathed in a font of forgiveness day and night. When you’re a blackout drinker and your nightly activities are related to you by those that you insulted, harassed, and otherwise abused you get used to saying things like, “I’m sorry, I really don’t remember that.” Or “I can’t believe I said, did, or acted in that manner and I sincerely hope you know that it has nothing to do with you and everything to do with my drinking.” Whatever! You get to say, “I’m sorry? a lot, and you know what, people are generally willing to say they forgive you.

The forgiveness factor is directly related to how long people have known you. If it’s an old friend, a close relative, a spouse, brother or sister, then the forgiveness font is fairly plentiful. You can bathe there night and day if you wish – if you can stand the looks of disgust as they say they forgive you, if you can bring yourself to face them one more time, or if simply you can take any more forgiveness.

This a point that a lot of people don’t get, understand, – there comes a point at which you are so full of forgiveness that you can’t take anymore. How many times can you go back to a spouse and hear her say, “I forgive you, but I’ll never forget” – until you’re dreaming of the day when she’ll have Alzheimer’s. And by saying that you’re full of forgiveness doesn’t in this case mean that you’ve been forgiving a lot of folks it means that you have been forgiven umpteen times and the forgiveness of others is beginning to look bad on you – like a cheap suit.

And speaking of cheap suits I can’t help but free associate to what Dietrich Bonhoeffer called cheap grace. And in the end that’s what forgiveness of those multiple transgressions begins to feel like – cheap grace. You’ve gotten away with murder – once again.

“Father, forgive them, for they know not what they do.”

(Luke 23:24 KJV).

Jesus supposedly said this from the cross while he was hanging there, nailed up so that the weight of his body would slowly suffocate him. His feet nailed to a support with his knees bent so all the weight would be on his arms. In all that pain Jesus said, Forgive them, they know not what they do? Luke’s one of the later Gospels. Lots of additions and traditions got blended into the good doctor’s book.

The earliest gospel, Mark, was written before Luke. And on the cross Jesus is reported to have said only one thing, Eloi, Eloi, Lama Sabachthani! Aramaic for “My god, my god, why has thou forsaken me?”

So – Which story do you buy?

In Luke Jesus forgives his murderers as he is being murdered. In Mark Jesus? only voice on the cross is a voice of anger, rage, resentment and hurt!

My thesis for today is simple: If you think forgiveness is a difficult problem – you’re right, but probably not for the right reasons! Forgiveness is a symptom – the real problem is anger! Because we can’t forgive someone without first being angry with them. And not many people want to own their anger!

Traditionally anger is considered to be one of the seven deadly sins – remembering that sin is simply separation from God or from the source of our being. Do you remember your seven deadlies – let me refresh your memory; Pride, Envy, Anger, Avarice, Sadness, Gluttony & Lust.

The American Buddhist Monk, Phillip Kapleau, said “Anger is the means of staving off the fear of the isolation of dying.” The solitariness of death scares the Be-Jesus out of us and that fear inspires anger.

In psychological circles it is believed that anger, pure anger, never happens and that anger is a cluster emotion – secondary to and combined with fear and threat.

The reason we have trouble forgiving is that we have not allowed ourselves the luxury of our anger. Acting out our anger can kill others, stuffing our anger can kill us. We seem to be caught between a rock and a hard place.

If the source of anger is threat or fear, then we must understand what threatens us, what we are truly afraid of. It is rather human-like to defend ourselves when we are being threatened.

Recently a president of a prominent Democratic nation has built his entire regime around being threatened. 

My friend the Buddhist monk, Claude AnShin Thomas, who is also a Vietnam Veteran, said that after 9/11 we had an enormous opportunity to turn the dharma wheel. Turning the dharma wheel is a good thing for Buddhist – it’s sort of like teaching peace. The world post 9/11 was on our side – the world was reaching out to us. What would have happened if when we flew over Afghanistan we had dropped, instead of bombs, food, medicine and supplies? What if the better angles of our natures had responded?

In her Pulitzer Prize winning novel, Gilead, Marilynne Robinson, has the old, dying preacher writing a letter to his seven-year-old son. In part of the letter he says, “I would advise you against defensiveness on principle. It precludes the best eventualities along with the worst. At the most basic level it expresses a lack of faith. As I have said, the worst eventualities can have great value as experience. And often enough, when we think we are protecting ourselves, we are struggling against our rescuer.” Another problem – how do we see Osama bin Laden as a rescuer?

Perhaps the heart of this problem surfaces best when we get away from the world of morality and enter the world of aesthetics. John Calvin, pre-eminent among the 16th Century Reformed theologians, says that each of us is an actor on God’s stage and that God is our audience. This gets at the point in a more convenient and expedient manner. For if our actions are not to be judged morally by those who surround us and go to make up our lives, but rather they are to be judged as a performance – then we get closer to the problem. Is an actor forgiven a bad performance? Do we feel a need to forgive a painter for a bad painting? When we hear someone play the violin like it’s a cat being tortured, do we even begin to think that we need to forgive that person their bad playing?

When an actor has a bad performance they are encouraged not to dwell on it. The best way to do this is to be in the moment and the next time the curtain comes up to begin again, to start over as if it were the first time the actor had ever performed that play.

Joel Gregory who used to be the preacher at First Baptist in Dallas calls this beginning again the final stage of forgiveness. Imagine you’ve got a daughter that you’ve disowned and simply telling her one day, “I’d like to be your dad again, and I’d like you to be my daughter again.” Or say you’ve got an old friend that you’ve fallen out with – you’d say to that friend, “Hey, let’s start over, let’s be friends again.” Sure you run the risk of being rebuffed, but is that any worse than waking up every morning with those same tapes of resentment and bitterness running through your heart and mind? Starting over again would be akin to beginning a new chapter in the story of your friendship, a new chapter in the narrative of what it means to be a father who has a daughter.

We all tell ourselves stories – that’s how we make our lives meaningful – everyone does it from childhood to old age. These stories are sometimes known as core narratives. They are no more or less true than the narrative of Jesus itself. The stories we tell ourselves are there to keep us in a comfort zone – whatever makes us happy or strokes us is in. Whatever we don’t like we either keep it out or expand the story to contain the discomfort.

To forgive one must first realize what has scared us into being angry – what has pushed us out of our comfort zone.

Reality has a way of not cooperating with our comfort zones. If you’re angry a lot or feel powerless to forgive those that have dumped upon your dreams then the stories you are telling yourself might sound like this, “This isn’t fair, I’m a good person. Things like this don’t happen to good people. Where is the justice in what has happened to me?” You see the problem doesn’t lie in the events themselves – in reality. The problem lies in your interpretation of the events – how well you have or have not included these threatening events in your core narratives. For in the end the only thing that actually counts is your interpretation of reality.

Feeling anxious, angry, unforgiving – it’s probably time to rewrite your core narrative.

Do you remember the way you felt when the Beatles went from the loving mop heads of The Rubber Soul Album to the freaks of Sgt. Pepper’s Lonely Hearts Club Band?

The Beatles had met the Maha-Rishi, they’d gone to India, George had taken sitar lessons, and oh yeah, they’d dropped Acid.

Their psychological experiences caused them to rewrite, refigure, reformat, reinvent who the Beatles were and if you loved them because, as John said, they were more popular than Jesus Christ, himself, or if you loved them in spite of this statement, then you – who could have been threatened by their change – you changed, too. You and I helped rewrite the core narrative of who the Beatles were. And, of course, it didn’t hurt if you had also dropped acid.

Can’t forgive someone for what they’ve done to you, how they abused you, discarded you, betrayed you. Rewrite your story. Put their actions in perspective, deal with them, their actions, your reactions, detriangulate yourself, redefine yourself so that your understanding of grace and justice is not so narrowly construed.

Try to remember if you’ve allowed someone to stomp on your dream there was a time when you thought that person worthy of your dream. It helps to again give that person as much credit as you can for being a good and worthy human being. Don’t forget the minute community is posited – the second you have an alliance, a love, a relationship you have automatically given the other person the trump card of betrayal. People act out from their fears/threats/hurts. Can we even know why someone chooses to play the trump card of betrayal? Perhaps it would help to remember when we have in times past played such a card?

So – let go of the story that hurts you. Write a story that heals and blesses you.

Frederick Nietzsche once said, “That which does not kill me – makes me stronger.” We must, if we are to survive, optimize the possibilities for survival.

And it’s not as simple as either you see the glass half empty or half full – no!

You’ve told yourself the same stories for so many years – are you happy yet? Do you still have fear? Do you still feel threatened?

You’ve got to expand your repertoire. Write some new material for God’s sake. If you were a comedian you’d be booed off the stage!

Again, Marilynne Robinson in her Pulitzer Prize winning book, Gilead, suggests that looking at our relationship with God in this actor/performer mode, a la John Calvin, is one way to see how God might enjoy us. In other words, God isn’t passing morality judgments on us. The book of life isn’t full of black marks; it’s full of bad reviews.

And what is the difference you might ask? Glad you ask that! We can’t learn anything from a moral judgment – other than the fact that we are in fact wrong! But from a bad review – my god the possibilities are endless.

In the first play I ever wrote, entitled, “The Valley of the Shadow? the reviewer from the Tallahassee Democrat, John Habich, raked me across the coals. At one point in the review he said that my play had more tragic flaws in it than the Iliad and the Odyssey combined. Did I cry over this review? No, I contacted the paper, had a meeting with John and began to learn more about playwriting as a product of that review.

What if we had been taught that God was really a life-coach, that God was on our side and somewhere along the way she had suggested ways in which we could, you know, enhance our performance?

But what if you feel that you are literally caught in a hellish situation – caught in a performance not of your own design? What do you do then?

Concentration camp survival literature consistently shows that even in that environment the way the people in the camps reacted, responded to that horrific environment made all the difference in the world. You’ve got to look for the cracks in the door of fate. You’re the salesperson for your life – you see the door of fate crack open – stick your foot in there. Impose yourself – sing, dance, whatever the situation calls for.

In conclusion I’d like to offer you an easy formula for forgiveness – a way for you to know how to deal with your anger, whom to forgive and how to forgive them – unfortunately no such formula exists. Like much of life, the manner in which we deal with our anger at people, situations and even our anger with inanimate objects brings a great deal to bear on the people that could benefit from our forgiveness, never forgetting that we are one of those people.

I want to reiterate the fact that you are the dealer in your life. I want to remind you as the dealer of your life you can reshuffle the deck any time you like and start a new deal. But you need to keep in mind that no matter how many times you shuffle your deck, once you enter relationship, community or any sort of intimacy the card at the top of the deck, the one you’re about to deal out is always the trump card of betrayal. It looks like a card trick, but it turns out the trick may be on you.

If you simply don’t want to deal with others, then you can play solitaire. Lots of people have done it, some have actually won at that game – Zen Masters and some religious mystics of every order come to mind. But I must warn you there is a danger in playing solitaire. You just might deal the trump card of betrayal to yourself. State institutions are full of people who have dealt themselves this card and I can only conjecture that suicides are holding this card in their hand for years before they actually play it.

Forty-five years ago Dr. Rachel Naomi Remen had a patient who had been lost in a snowstorm during a skiing trip. When they found him he was badly frost bit. It looked like he was going to lose both of his feet. He waited for a world-class vascular surgeon and with this doctor’s help his left foot became better while his right foot took a turn for the worse. This surgeon and a team of other surgeons all recommended the amputation of the right foot. He refused.

Finally when the toxins from that gangrenous foot were surging through his body and he was on the edge of death, the doctors and his finance made one last effort to get his permission to amputate. Again he refused. At which point his finance pulled the brilliant diamond ring from her finger and thrust it upon the black little toe of his right foot. “I hate this damned foot,” she sobbed, “if you want this foot so damned much, why don’t you marry it!” He had the amputation. They are still married.

There’s a parallel between our resentments, our betrayals, our inability to forgive and get on with life and this man’s gangrenous foot. I guess the question boils down to; what are you married to – the baggage of your life, or life itself.

2005 Sermon Index

 

2005 Sermons

Sermon Topic Author Date
Christmas Day Stories, 2005 Davidson Loehr 12-25-05
Love Stories Davidson Loehr 12-18-05
Magic Davidson Loehr 12-11-05
The Word Was Made Flesh and Dwelt Among Us Jack R. Harris-Bonham 12-04-05
Secular Wisdom Davidson Loehr 11-27-05
Thanksgiving 2005 Davidson Loehr 11-20-05
T. T. T. Davidson Loehr 11-13-05
Gifts For All Occasions Jack R. Harris-Bonham 11-06-05
Happy Halloween Davidson Loehr 10-30-05
Liberal Religion, part 3: The Religion of Jesus vs the Religion About Jesus Davidson Loehr 10-23-05
Liberal Religion, Part 2 Davidson Loehr 10-16-05
Media Addiction Davidson Loehr 10-09-05
Finding Ourselves, Our Souls & Our Religious Center Jack R. Harris-Bonham 10-02-05
Liberal Religion, Part 1 Davidson Loehr 09-25-05
Who is Your Audience? Davidson Loehr 09-18-05
Size Matters! Davidson Loehr 09-11-05
WWJD? Davidson Loehr 09-04-05
Farewell Musings Victoria Shepherd Rao 06-26-05
Behind the Scenes Davidson Loehr 06-19-05
The Priesthood of All Believers Davidson Loehr 06-12-05
Knowing Your Nugget Victoria Shepherd Rao 05-29-05
The Cost of Money Davidson Loehr 05-22-05
Transforming Liberalism of James Luther Adams Rev George Beach 05-15-05
When You Love Someone: HS seniors bridging service Victoria Shepherd Rao 05-08-05
American Myths Davidson Loehr 05-01-05
Growing Up and Finding Ourselves: Annual youth service Davidson Loehr 04-24-05
Earth Day Celebration Victoria Shepherd Rao 04-17-05
Life Shrinks and Expands in Proportion to One’s Courage Davidson Loehr 04-10-05
Spiritual, Not Religious Dr. Laurel Hallman 04-03-05
Eastering Davidson Loehr 03-27-05
Coming of Age – Constantly! Davidson Loehr 03-20-05
Finding Your Own Voice Davidson Loehr 03-13-05
Women’s Wisdom, Women’s Work Victoria Shepherd Rao 03-06-05
About Schmidt – About Life – About Aging Nathan L. Stone 02-27-05
Walking the strait and narrow Rev Chuck Freeman 02-20-05
On Tolerating Bad Religion Davidson Loehr 02-13-05
God Davidson Loehr 02-06-05
Myths to Live By, Part 5 Davidson Loehr 01-30-05
Finding Our Way Through The Dark Victoria Shepherd Rao 01-23-05
Myths to Live By, Part 4 Davidson Loehr 01-16-05
On Spiritual Practices Victoria Shepherd Rao 01-09-05
Reclaiming Our Ultimate Concerns From Religion Davidson Loehr 01-02-05

Christmas Day Stories, 2005

© Davidson Loehr 2005

© Jack Harris-Bonham 2005

25 December 2005

First UU Church of Austin

4700 Grover Ave., Austin, TX 78756

www.austinuu.org

Prayer

Let us not forget the spirit of Christmas. Let us keep it in our hearts. The spirit of compassion, the gift of tenderness and love: let us keep these with us always.

Let us remember our most generous and caring gift to someone else this season. For what we did that once, we can do more often, if only we will.

We who are capable of both good and evil, of compassion and of indifference, let us treat one another in ways that beg to be remembered, rather than forgiven.

For there is a spirit that wants to be born within us, and it needs our help. The spirit of simple and direct care for one another wants to be born. The better angels of our nature want to be heard.

And so let us not forget the spirit of Christmas. Let us keep it in our hearts. The spirit of compassion, the gifts of tenderness and love: let us keep these with us: today, tomorrow, and always.

Amen.

HOMILY: The Angel of Marye’s Heights

Jack Harris-Bonham

Introduction: You know the story of Jesus’ birth. Most times it is the second chapter of Luke that’s read in Christmas services, And it came to pass in those days, that there went out a decree from Caesar Augustus, that all the world should be taxed – And all went to be taxed, every one into his own city. And Joseph also went up from Galilee, out of the city of Nazareth, into Judea, unto the city of David, which is called Bethlehem; To be taxed with Mary his espoused wife, being great with child – And she brought forth her firstborn son, and wrapped him in swaddling clothes, and laid him in a manger; because there was no room for them in the inn (Luke 2:1-7 KJV).

And, of course, this story of a virgin birth and the birth being in a stable, a cave dug into the side of a hill, mirrors the birth of Mithras. This birth from the darkness of a cave into the light also fits the worship of the Sun, which during the Winter Solstice has reached its nadir and after December the 21st the days grow longer. To ancient communities tied to their agricultural traditions, this rebirth of the sun is of absolute importance for without it crops would not grow to maturity and the harvest would fail.

But the New Testament story of the birth of Jesus is still a story unto itself. All stories borrow from other stories, for, in truth, there is nothing new under the sun.

But this is not the only part of the Christmas story that is told in the New Testament. Remember there are four gospels although only Matthew and Luke deal with the birthing of Jesus, Mark and John seem satisfied to begin with the baptism of Jesus by John the Baptist.

But for a storyteller like myself it’s imperative to consider all the elements of the birthing story because it is with all these elements that we begin to get a picture of this man called Jesus. And here I’m not referring to whether or not this man was an historical person, but only to the man known as Jesus within the texts we have – in other words – the man Jesus as a character in his own story.

And so it is that I now turn to the part of the story in Matthew, which has entertained many throughout the ages, and has been a part of every nativity scene since nativity scenes were made, and I’m referring to the Three Wise Men.

For the Western Christian church whose center is still Rome the celebration of the epiphany is simply the visit of the Magi – which symbolizes the Messiah being presented to the Gentiles.

The wise men were not Jews. They are usually identified as Persian Priests, which make them Zoroastrian, or Mithraic Priests. The Christian Church borrowed the Zoroastrian story of people following a special star to find a newborn savior.

Back when the orthodox churches were struggling to make a Christian calendar two separate dates for Jesus’ birth were celebrated. The Eastern Orthodox and Eastern Rite churches chose January 6th. The Roman Catholic Church chose December the 25th. It is between these two dates that we celebrate the 12 days of Christmas. Thank God the merchants haven’t gotten a hold of that one! There are only 10 shopping days till Christmas, or 22 days if you’ve been slow on the uptake!

At the beginning of the movie, “The Life of Bryan,” the three wise men come into a stable and lay their gifts down in front of the child. When they ask the child’s name and find out that it’s Bryan they realize their mistake and begin taking back their gifts. Before it’s all over they have to wrestle the last gifts from Bryan’s mother, eventually knocking her down in the process. It’s a funny moment in the film, but it points to a darker aspect of Jesus’ birth that’s usually not talked about at Christmas time.

Now when Jesus was born in Bethlehem of Judea in the days of Herod the king, behold, there came wise men from the east to Jerusalem, Saying. Where is he that is born King of the Jews? For we have seen his star in the east and have come to worship him – And Herod sent them to Bethlehem, and said, Go and search diligently for the young child; and when ye have found him, bring me word again, that I may come and worship him also (Matthew 2: 1-2, 8 KJV).

Then of course the wise men, being wise, had a dream in which they were told not to return to Herod, left for their country by another route. And likewise – I love the fairy tale like quality of these stories – Joseph is warned by none other than the Angel of the Lord to flee into Egypt until Herod dies, and he takes his young wife and newborn son and does so.

When Herod found out that he’d been mocked and outsmarted by the wise men he “slew all the children that were in Bethlehem, and in all the coasts thereof, from two years old and under.”

Now, the Jesus of this story – if he is the Jesus who teaches love your neighbor as yourself, and be good to those who persecute you, then, how does this Jesus feel about his birth being a blood bath for the babies and toddlers of the Bethlehem area?

I say that this incident informed Jesus’ ministry, that it was a part of who he was as a teacher and healer. In fact, from a story standpoint, this incident foreshadows his own death. The children that died because Jesus was born in their town, the innocents that were murdered foretell the fact that Jesus himself would be innocent of the charges brought against him, and his death is the other bookend of this Messianic story.

And now I wish to speak about a subject that you will feel is totally unrelated to the birth of Jesus, but it is not. I wish to speak of a Civil War battle, the battle of Fredericksburg, Virginia; especially I wish to speak of the culmination of that battle – that day, 13 December 1862.

On that day Union General Ambrose Burnside sent seven divisions, two brigades in each division, fourteen brigades in all, across the Rappahannock River on pontoon bridges, through the town of Fredericksburg to the southwest corner of the town. From there they had to cross a field on a slight incline of about 400 yards to the base of a hill called Marye’s Hill or Marye’s Heights. At the bottom of that hill there was a stonewall and standing behind that stonewall there were Rebel troops and this is what you could see of those Rebel troops as they aimed at the Yankee boys who came running up that hill. And what you could see of those Billy Yanks? All of them from head to toe. Some of those Yanks had love letters on them and in one diary one soldier had written, “Fredericksburg – today I die!” They had their names pinned to their clothes so that they could be later identified.

Now, if General Burnside really wanted that hill he could have taken all seven divisions, all fourteen brigades and he could have charged them all at once. Oh, he would have lost lots of men, but he could have taken the Heights. But instead of doing it that way he decided he would have brigade at a time attack – sort of an intramural contest – to see which brigade could get there first. So they attacked separately into the teeth and the strength of the enemy – into the teeth and the strength of the enemy – into the teeth and the strength of the enemy – fourteen charges in all!

Now, on top of that hill – out of rifled musket range there stood two Confederate Generals – General Longstreet and General Lee. As the attacks progressed, finally, for lack of anything better to say, General Longstreet turned to General Lee and he said, “Those Union boys are falling like rain off the eves of a house.” General Lee turned to General Longstreet and he said something very profound, he said, “It’s a good thing war is so terrible, otherwise we’d grow even more fond of it.”

At the end of the day, when all fourteen brigades had been repulsed, and the dead and dying lay on the frozen fields in front of the stonewall, Sergeant Richard Kirkland of the 2nd South Carolina approached his commander General Kershaw. Sergeant Kirkland asked General Kershaw if he could hear the cries of the wounded on the other side of the stonewall and then he added, “I can’t stand this! All day and all night I have heard those poor people crying for water, and I can stand it no longer. I – ask permission – to give them water.”

General Kershaw looked at the young sergeant with his neatly mended uniform and his trimmed moustache. “You’re likely enough to get a bullet through the head when you step over that wall.”

The sergeant looked down at his muddied boots. “I know that,” he said, as he looked the general in the eye, he added, “but if you’ll permit me, sir, I am willing to try.”

When Sergeant Kirkland stepped over the wall, Union sharpshooters lowered their barrels in his direction. Funny he wasn’t carrying a weapon and if he was a scavenger why was he carrying all those canteens. Then Sergeant Kirkland knelt at the first wounded Union soldier and gave him water, then another, and another. Both sides watched in disbelief as what became known as the Angel of Marye’s Heights ministered aid and water to the hundreds of wounded union soldiers lying in those fields.

“Ye have heard that it hath been said, Thou shalt love thy neighbor and hate thine enemy. But I say unto you, Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you-” (Matthew 5:43-44 KJV)

Conclusion: In both cases – the birth of Jesus and the slaughter at the stonewall – in both cases the slaughter of innocence was overcome by innocence itself. In unpredictable ways there was a new birth, a new way to be. And it’s not that the slaughter was overcome, but rather witnessed by innocence, and not simply witnessed, but ministered to. There is a way to see Jesus’ ministry as nothing more or less than making up for the death of those innocent babies born near Bethlehem.

It’s a matter of focal points. If Jesus does nothing when he grows up – if the story of Jesus was simply the story of a man who could have cared less for other men, then the focal point of his life would have been the deaths of those innocence children. If Sergeant Kirkland had not crossed that wall what would have been a slaughter would have been nothing more than a slaughter. By the way, that night as the Angel of Marye’s Heights ministered from soldier to soldier, that far south for the first time anyone could remember, the aurora borealis gyrated its brilliance above the battlefield. “And the glory of the Lord shown round about them, and they were sore afraid.” It is in the face of such odds that good people act.

And that’s my point this morning. The birth of Jesus and the Angel of Marye’s Heights – they are a mirror of every age and our own time. What do you make the focal point of life – it’s meaninglessness, the slaughter of innocence, the horror of war – or are there acts of redemption, small but powerful focal points which put this hard world into perspective?

What do you focus on and what do you make background? Maybe aesthetics bleeds into ethics here? Envisioning a better world with better myths and better stories – that’s how things start. Everything manmade that you can see was once an idea. When an idea catches on a new reality appears. What are you imaging this Christmas – for yourselves – your families – your town – your country – your world – your universe?

It’s time to cross over the wall and go forth into the battlefield. It’s time to succor the injured, feed the poor, water the thirsty.

Yes, it’s absurd, but someone has to do it – who better than those who propose to believe in the principles of unity and the universal?

The birth of Jesus.

Sergeant Kirkland, The Angel of Marye’s Heights.

The power of an act of love.

All of these simple remedies for unbelievably hard times.

HOMILY: Christmas Stories

Davidson Loehr

For your Christmas morning, both Jack and I decided to bring you stories. I had never before heard that wonderful story from the War Between the States – what Northerners, but not Southerners, call the Civil War. It reminded me of another war story, that happened 91 years ago today.

It’s the story of the Christmas Truce that took place along the Western Front during World War I. The Western Front was a fierce battle line extending hundreds of miles, and it may be best known as part of the title of the 1930 film “All Quiet on the Western Front,” one of the most powerful anti-war movies ever made.

But several days before Christmas in 1914, soldiers from a German regiment lobbed a carefully packaged chocolate cake across no-man’s land into the British trenches. A message was attached asking whether holding a one-hour ceasefire that evening might be possible, so that the troops could celebrate their captain’s birthday.

The British stopped firing, stood on their edge of their trenches and applauded as a German band struck up a rendition of “Happy Birthday”. Besides the mortars made of chocolate cake, thousands of German Christmas trees delivered to the front line helped transform the battlefield. “It was pure illumination – along the walls of sandbags along the trenches, there were Christmas trees lit up by burning candles. The British responded by shouting and clapping.”

What followed was a bout of unprecedented fraternization between enemy forces that has never been repeated on an equivalent scale. German soldiers bearing candles, chunks of cake and cigars met British soldiers carrying cigarettes and Christmas pudding into the no-man’s land between their opposing trenches. Soldiers left their weapons behind, as the two sides exchanged presents, sang songs and played football, using tin cans for makeshift balls and spiked German helmets for goalposts.

The truce collapsed shortly after Christmas when news of the ceasefire reached the horrified high commands on both sides, and strict military discipline was reinstated. – Though in one area in Belgium, the ceasefire continued until the end of February 1915. (© 2003 Independent Digital (UK) Ltd, by Tony Patterson, 12-24-03)

There may not be another war story like this, or another Christmas story like this, in all of human history.

The second story I want to share with you was sent to me by Hannah Wells, our ministerial intern of two years ago. It’s adapted from a story that took place in 1994, the last time Christmas fell on a Sunday.

THE GIFT 

by Nancy Dahlberg (adapted)

(While I left most of the original writing, I rewrote some to fit my style, added a couple paragraphs, added the ending, and changed the sexes of the speaker and the baby. In the original story, the mother told the story about her baby son.)

It was Sunday, Christmas. Our family had spent the holidays in San Francisco with my wife’s parents. But in order for us to be back to work on Monday, we found ourselves driving the four hundred miles home to Los Angeles on Christmas Day.

It was normally an eight hour drive; but with kids it can be a fourteen hour endurance test. When we could stand it no longer, we stopped for lunch in King City. This little metropolis is made up of six gas stations and three diners, and it was into one of those diners that the four of us trooped, road weary and saddle sore.

As I sat little Mary, our one year old, in a high chair, I looked around the room and wondered, “What are we doing in this place?”

The restaurant was nearly empty. We were the only family, and ours were the only children. Everyone else was busy eating, talking quietly, aware perhaps that we were all somehow out of place on this special day.

My reverie was interrupted when I heard Mary squeal with glee: “Hiya, Hiya!” She pounded her fat little baby hands – whack, whack – on the metal high chair tray. Her face was alive with excitement, eyes wide, gums bared in a toothless grin. She wriggled, and chirped, and giggled all her little girlish giggles. Then I saw the source of her excitement, and I was repulsed.

There was a tattered old rag of a coat – obviously bought by someone else many years ago – dirty, greasy, and worn. Baggy pants, both they and the zipper at about half-mast over a spindly old body. Toes that poked out of what used to be shoes. A shirt that had ring-around-the-collar all over, and a face from another place and time, maybe another universe. He didn’t have many more teeth than our baby did. His hair was uncombed, unwashed and unbearable, and a nose so varicose that it looked like the map of a big city. I was too far away to smell him, but I knew he smelled. And his hands were waving in the air, flapping around on loose wrists, with no shame at all.

“Hiya, Hiya baby! I see you, cutie!” I looked at my wife, who was somewhere between nausea and panic.

But Baby Mary continued to laugh and scream “Hiya Hiya!” Every call was answered. I noticed waitresses’ eyebrows shoot to their foreheads, and several people sitting near us made those “ahem!” and “harrumph!” noises.

This old geezer was creating a nuisance and using my baby to do it! Not that she seemed to mind, as she bounced up and down shouting “Hiya Hiya.” I’m glad she’s friendly, but when she grows up she’ll learn there are boundaries, limits, for this kind of easy friendliness. If you don’t watch it, it can get you into a lot of trouble.

Our meal came, but the nuisance continued. Now the old bum was shouting from across the room: “Do ya know patty cake? – Atta girl – Do ya know peek-a-boo? – Hey, look, she knows peek-a-boo!” Nobody thought it was cute. The guy was drunk and a disturbance. I was embarrassed. My wife was humiliated. Even our six-year-old wanted to know why that old man was talking so loud.

I thought, “Come on, you miserable old goat! It’s Christmas! People are just trying to eat, visit, and recover from long rides in cramped, noisy cars. If you can’t respect our fatigue, can’t you at least care that it’s Christmas?

We ate in silence – except Baby Mary, who was in her own little world, running through her whole repertoire for the admiring applause of a skid-row bum. My wife went to pay the check, begging me to get the baby and meet her at the car.

It’s funny, though not fair, how just one person who doesn’t get it can ruin a day for so many others. I bundled Mary up and looked toward the exit where we could escape. The old man sat poised and waiting, his chair directly between us and the door. I thought, “Lord, just let me out of here before he says another word!” We headed toward the door.

But Mary had other plans. As I got closer to the man, I turned my back, walking to sidestep him and any air he might be breathing. As I turned, Mary, all the while with her eyes riveted to her new best friend, leaned far over my arm, reaching with both arms in a baby’s “pick me up” posture.

In a split second of balancing my baby and turning to counter her shifting weight, I came eye to eye with the old man. Mary was lunging for him, arms spread wide.

The bum’s eyes both asked and implored, “Would you let me hold your baby?” There was no need for me to answer, since Mary propelled herself from my arms to the man’s.

Suddenly a very old man and a very young baby were involved in a love relationship. Mary laid her tiny head upon the man’s ragged shoulder. The man’s eyes closed, and I saw tears hover beneath his lashes. His aged hands full of grime, and pain, and hard labor – gently, so gently, cradled my baby’s bottom and stroked her back.

I stood dumbstruck. The old man rocked and cradled Mary in his arms for a moment, and then his eyes opened and set squarely on mine. He said in a firm commanding voice, “You take care of this baby.” Somehow I muttered “I will,” from a throat that was suddenly tight. He pried Mary from his chest – unwillingly, longingly – as though he were in pain.

I held my arms open to receive my baby and again the gentleman addressed me. “God bless you, sir. You’ve given me my Christmas gift.” I said nothing more than a slurred thanks. With Mary back in my arms, I ran for the car. My wife didn’t understand why I was crying and holding little Mary so tightly, or why I kept saying, “My God, My God, forgive me!”

It was the Christmas that will never die, and never stop giving its painful, embarrassing gift of something so pure it could only have been of God. Lovely stories!

The last living participant in that World War I Christmas Truce died last month, at the age of 109. And a new movie has been released in Europe about the Truce. So 91 years later, the story lives on as a reminder of our higher calling.

And we know there’s a penalty for not honoring those better angels of our nature. It’s that feeling you had when the father in the last story cried out “My God, my God, forgive me!” Forgive me for forgetting. Forgive me for treating this homeless man no better than my society does. Forgive me for building walls rather than bridges. Forgive me for forgetting that he was my brother.

We have fewer than twelve hours left of this Christmas when those angels, those spirits, are so openly welcomed into our hearts. We do not want to forget them again. We do not want to forget. Before it slips away for another year, let us close by cradling these holy spirits in a prayer:

Let us not forget the spirit of Christmas. Let us keep it in our hearts. The spirit of compassion, the gift of tenderness and love: let us keep these with us always.

Let us remember our most generous and caring gift to someone else this season. For what we did that once, we can do more often, if only we will.

We who are capable of both good and evil, of compassion and of indifference, let us treat one another in ways that beg to be remembered, rather than forgiven.

For there is a spirit that wants to be born within us, and it needs our help. The spirit of simple and direct care for one another wants to be born. The better angels of our nature want to be heard.

And so let us not forget the spirit of Christmas. Let us keep it in our hearts. The spirit of compassion, the gifts of tenderness and love: let us keep these with us: today, tomorrow, and always.

Amen.

Love Stories

© Davidson Loehr

18 December 2005

First UU Church of Austin

4700 Grover Ave., Austin, TX 78756

www.austinuu.org

Listen to the sermon by clicking the play button.

PRAYER

Let us learn how to open our gifts. Christmas is coming, wrapped presents are everywhere, and we still struggle to know how to open our gifts, even to recognize them.

The pure gift of just being here – what’s that worth? And being with people we love, and who love us – what’s that selling for on the Dow or the Nasdaq? And our health – whatever degree of health we have, it’s better than having a lot less health. It makes a big difference. What’s that worth?

So many gifts and so many of us who have not learned how to see them. Let us become aware of those simple gifts of being here, loving and being loved, the gifts of our health. Those gifts are the real treasures of this holiday season, and we don’t have to wait until Christmas to open them. In fact, it’s best that we don’t wait. Let us open our gifts of life, love and spirit, and spread them all around our lives, sitting there right in the middle of them. That will help us prepare for Christmas by reminding ourselves that we already have the really important gifts, while on Christmas morning we can open our gaily-wrapped trinkets and toys.

Amen.

SERMON: Love Stories

Some of you may be thinking “All right, this is a church and it’s Christmas time, so tell me a story, take me in, make me believe things that I know aren’t so, just for a week. Do the Christmas thing – if you pretend it could be true, I’ll pretend I believe you, and we’ll fake it through another holiday season. Just tell me a story and take me in.” Even if you wouldn’t say it that way, you recognize the sentiment, and many of you may identify with it.

But others come to church a week before Christmas and think, “All right now, it’s that season when all preachers lie because they think they can get away with it. But don’t lie to me. Don’t insult my mind or my spirit by feeding me hokum. Now more than at any other time of the year, I need the one thing churches almost never offer: I need truth. So don’t you dare lie to me!”

And others are in between, wondering and hoping that there could be truth that’s still magical, and magic that’s true.

Really, this is the range of expectations people bring to religion all the time, everywhere. We know religions always teach using stories, and a lot of people think you only use stories when you don’t have facts, the way Plato defined myths as lies 2400 years ago – though Plato was one of the great mythmakers of Western history.

But you can’t escape stories. You can just hope to tell the difference between stories that serve us and stories that enslave us. Even sciences give their facts a human meaning by embedding them in stories. We might doze off in a talk about Chlorofluorocarbon emissions, but we understand the story of global warming, and the picture of melting ice caps that can raise the sea level and flood some of the world’s major cities.

We can understand that those species of plants and animals that fit the demands of their surroundings would do well, but it’s easier to remember the phrase “survival of the fittest” because it implies all kinds of stories, including a lot of cowboy Westerns.

But even things presented in the media as facts – are usually parts of stories, whether we realize it or not. Right now, for instance, we are told repeatedly that we are at war with Iraq. Well, that one word “war” calls up all kinds of stories of heroic sacrifice made in the name of high and noble ideals, usually against evil enemies.

But the truth is that we aren’t in a war with Iraq. We invaded their country, illegally and against all international law. Our administration lied to our own people to do it, in order to control Iraq’s money, their oil, and occupy their strategic position. What our media call Iraqi “insurgents” aren’t insurgents; they’re fighting and dying to repel a foreign invader that has stolen their money and murdered over 100,000 of their people. That’s a very different story. If the media called it an illegal invasion, called the theft of their money and oil robbery or piracy, and called the deaths of Iraqi citizens murders, then we would have a very different story, and one the country would not support for long. It matters what you call it, because what you call it calls up images and stories that either sanction or condemn what we are doing.

All stories are trying to take us in. But with good stories, we want to be taken in. We love fiction that feeds our spirits, and don’t care a bit whether it’s true. In fact, we prefer stories to facts. This is a religious lesson, but I first learned it from a diaper commercial.

Some years ago, when Pampers came on the market, they were the first good disposable diaper. The advertisers could truthfully say they were the best in the world, because – well, they were the only disposable diaper in the world. So they decided to try an advertising campaign grounded in truth rather than the kinds of images and stories that advertisers prefer. They chose Texas as the test market for this campaign, and just told people the facts, and that Pampers were the best diapers you could buy. Nobody bought them. Apparently that wasn’t what parents were looking for.

So the ad agency decided, Well, we’ll just do it the old way. And they came up with the second ad. This ad said that a Pampers baby is a happy baby. And the rest is history. A happy baby – there’s a whole story tucked in those two words. A happy baby means a happy marriage, a happy family, and young parents who must be doing a good job of parenting. And those are things parents do want to hear: it’s worth the price of a box of diapers any day. And if the diapers are good – well, that’s a bonus.

We prefer stories to facts. We don’t like to admit it, but it’s true.

If you doubt it, just remember the last time you watched “The Nutcracker,” and were perfectly happy seeing dancing mice and a wooden nutcracker who came to life. Not a bit of it actually, historically, happened, you know. But you don’t care a bit, because it’s such a wonderful story.

If you haven’t seen “The Nutcracker,” and still think we prefer truth to fiction, I have one word for you: movies. The documentaries seldom move us. But show us a story that we can imagine ourselves in or connected to, and the tears will flow, our hearts will be touched, and our spirits will be opened and fed.

The best religious stories can do this, too. Some are educational, like the Good Samaritan, or a lot of Buddhist stories. Some are challenging stories, like the stories of the prophets saying God doesn’t care what we believe, only how we behave toward the weakest among us.

And the best of them, those that come from a deep love of life that makes us fall in love with some of the deeper parts of life – those are love stories.

This is the kind of love story that’s the best thing about religions: stories that can make us fall in love with life at deeper levels. They’re everywhere, and I’ve brought you three short ones, from three different religions today.

The first story has a story of its own attending it. A couple years ago, we had an Indian woman who often attended here. She always came late and left early. But one Sunday she came a little early and I saw her, so I went up to her, welcomed her, and asked why she usually came late and left early.

She explained that she had to drive her teen-aged son to Barsana Dahm, the wonderful Hindu temple south of town, then had to drive here, and then had to drive the 30 minutes south again to pick her son up. I said that was two hours of driving, and asked why she didn’t just bring her son here.

“Ah no,” she said, “because you have no good stories!” She said her son needed stories that stirred his mind and his heart, stories he would want to discuss at home during the week. Hinduism, she informed me, had many good stories. “Tell me one,” I asked. “Ah!” she said, “I could tell you a hundred!” “Just one.” “Very well, I’ll tell you the story he learned last week, and which our family has discussed over dinner all this week.”

It was a story about Krishna, probably Hinduism’s favorite picture of God. Krishna was a wonderful god, but as a boy he misbehaved – you could even call him a brat at times. So naturally, kids love him.

Krishna was chewing something in school, and the teacher saw him. He knew he was not supposed to chew gum. “Krishna,” she said, “What are you chewing?” “Nothing,” he replied, still chewing. “Krishna!” she said louder, “that is not true! You are chewing gum, aren’t you?” “No,” he said. She walked over to his desk, told him to stand up, and said “Now open your mouth. I want to look inside!”

So Krishna opened his mouth. The teacher bent down, looked inside his mouth, and saw – a hundred million galaxies. Inside that child were eternity and infinity, just as they are inside all children. That’s a love story! And this woman’s son spent a whole week discussing this story with his parents, and what it might mean to have an infinite and eternal identity inside of him: what it might mean for who he was and how he should live.

A second story isn’t so much a story as it is one sentence that, like Krishna’s mouth, contains a wonderful infinity of possibilities. It comes from Judaism, and is the simple statement where the writer has God say to the Hebrew people “I will be your father, and you will be my people.” God’s people: children of God: everyone! That’s pretty close to containing something infinite and eternal, like the Krishna story, isn’t it? It’s another love story.

And then there is the Christian story, the birth of the baby Jesus. The story is good, both for what it says and for what it does not say. Jesus wasn’t born in a castle, not even in a Holiday Inn, or the story would be saying that only the wealthy have that capacity for bearing the sacred. He wasn’t born to royalty, or it would be saying that only the powerful are really significant. No, in this story, the incarnation of God was born to common people, not rich ones. When God walked among us, he walked as one of us. In fact, it’s the only way he ever walks among us. And we could be incarnations of that spirit rightfully called Holy. For we are children of God and the hope of the world, if only we will be.

Told as history, it isn’t true. It didn’t happen. Told as science, it isn’t true. Humans aren’t conceived without chromosomes from two parents, and that’s done by actual sex, not just an idea. But as a love story, it’s wonderful. If you think about it, it is the Christian version of the story the Hindus tell in that wonderful story of Krishna containing the whole universe in him, or the Jews tell simply by having their God say “I will be your father and you will be my people.” If you’re looking for a story that comes from the depths – not of gods but of humans – then this season has some wonderful love stories for you.

And these love stories aren’t just about giving us a cradle, a manger to make us feel loved, though they can do that. They’re also about nurturing us, empowering us, to grow into our highest selves. They’re stories saying “You, you there: you have within you infinite possibilities. You’re a child of God. You are even, if you will be, an incarnation of God. Now. Go act like it!”

The best love stories give us a love that doesn’t stop until it overflows us, and we reach out to feed a hungry world with the overflow. That’s part of the meaning of reminding ourselves during this season that ” it is more blessed to give than to receive.” Because when we give, we are becoming the incarnation of those forces in the world, in the universe, that are only happy when they are giving unto others: giving life, love, hope, a healing touch, a caring presence. Presence. Spelled with a “c” rather than a “t” – a healing presence, a loving presence. Those are the greatest presents we can give one another, at Christmas or any other time.

It gives a whole new meaning to the words “Christmas presence.” The Christmas story has become mostly a merchants’ story about buying yourself into debt to impress your family and friends with gadgets and toys that will be forgotten in weeks or months. The emphasis is on how many presents you can get, or what they’re worth, or whether they’re cool or impressive enough. And that’s all wrong. There’s nothing there but greed, envy, and a one-upmanship that never ends until you have maxed out your credit cards.

But from the treasuries of the human imagination kept alive for us in the great love stories of religion, another possibility emerges. It is the possibility not of Christmas presents, but of a presence. A presence of love, of awareness, of knowing that within us are infinite possibilities. Within us is the spirit of a son or daughter of God, children of Life’s longing for itself. For we, if only we would realize it, are incarnations of God, needing to claim our sacred heritage, and live it.

These, of course, are stories. Are they true? Yes, these are true, even more true than mere facts. For these are love stories. And it doesn’t get much more true than that!

Magic

© Davidson Loehr 2005

11 December 2005

First UU Church of Austin

4700 Grover Ave., Austin, TX 78756

www.austinuu.org

Listen to the sermon by clicking the play button.

Prayer

We spend so much time looking for magic in the wrong places. We think it must be a hard thing to get, this magic, and we go through the motions of all the incantations, prayers, lucky charms and tricks we can find, trying to trick some magic into entering our souls.

This is the season when we will be charged a lot of money for seeking magic in the wrong places. And no matter how much we spend, toys aren’t likely to deliver the kind of magic for which we really yearn.

It’s the season when we chase after the spirit called Holy, and wish we could be caught by it.

It’s an important chase, but we don’t need to bring our credit cards. For the spirit of life and love and everything really worth the chase – not only is that spirit free, but it is also inside of us, waiting to be awakened, and noticed, so that it might do its work.

This season, let us conspire with the holy spirit to transform our hearts from stone to flesh, to reawaken our gratitude for this miracle of life, and our love for those who help feather our heart’s nest.

There is a glow, and a warmth that comes from looking for magic in the right places, and it can’t be begged, borrowed, stolen or bought. But it can be brought forth, from its home in the manger of our heart, and it can bless us. That blessing, that warmth, that connection, that feeling – that’s the magic that’s really worth seeking.

These holidays, let us seek for the magic of the season, but let us seek it in all the right places.

Amen.

SERMON: Magic

I began thinking about the idea of magic when I was talking with a colleague who is doing an interim ministry at an unhappy church. “I’m getting ready for the Christmas services,” she said, “but I don’t feel the magic.” Christmas is such a magical holiday that without that magic, it isn’t really Christmas.

I’ve been reading a book about magic, a book called Not in Kansas Anymore (Christine Wicker). The author used to be a religion writer for the Dallas Morning News, and brings a lot of skepticism to this subject of magic. But she spent a couple years looking for it among some very colorful people. She spent time with witches, vampires, werewolves and elves, and a host of others in all the costumes you could imagine, and some you couldn’t imagine.

This wasn’t about party tricks, or producing a quarter from behind someone’s ear. It’s what the communities she studied call “High magic.” It’s about transforming yourself. Magic is a search for a power of life by people who are missing it and want it. Magic is the effort to create a feeling that we’re somehow connected to larger powers, and that connection can bring us a feeling of being more alive.

Of the groups she studied, the most fascinating to me were the psychic vampires, because I’ve known a few. They told her they could drain energy from others just by being around them, and she said she sometimes felt drained after they left. These psychic vampires divided the world into two kinds of people: vampires and victims. Those who steal life, and those from whom they steal it.

While all these alternative magic-seekers are usually people for whom traditional religion can’t give them this power or satisfy this need, you don’t need religion to explain where they would get this view of our world as those who take and those who are taken from. They could get it from our economy, which serves the wealthiest at the expense of the poorest. Or they could see it in our imperialism: the notion that since we have the military might, we have the right to invade and rob any country with assets or strategic location we desire. Both our economy and our foreign policy operate a lot like vampires and victims: those with brute power feed on the life energy of those whose powers are more vulnerable, more easily stolen from them.

It’s about trying to take, steal, or buy something from others that can give us a kind of life feeling we don’t have. The whole notion is wrong: that we can steal or buy a worthwhile life. And once you think a quality life can be stolen or bought, we’re at the mercy of the advertising agencies who have made a multi-billion-dollar art of convincing us that their product can give us the magic we need.

So I’ve been thinking about the Christmas season in terms of magic this week. As some of you have heard, it’s the same week in which a bunch of evangelical Christian megachurches announced that they’ll be closed on Sunday the 25th of December. That tiresome crank, Jerry Falwell, has denounced them, as he has denounced the White House for sending “Holiday Greetings” cards, insisting that Christmas is a completely Christian holiday.

But Christmas isn’t a Christian holiday. As even a conservative New York Times op-ed writer reported yesterday (John Tierney, 10 December 2005), it is a winter solstice festival, and has been so for thousands of years. In the ancient calendar, the day we call December 25th was the date of the winter solstice. As such, it was automatically the birth day of all solar deities, including the Roman god Mithras. December 25th wasn’t adopted as Jesus’ birthday until the fourth century, the same time that Sunday was adopted as the Christian holy day. But Sunday is the day of the Sun: the holy day of solar deities. So nothing about this season, or Sunday, has anything to do with the man Jesus.

Christmas isn’t even a religious holiday; it’s a merchants’ holiday, the day they finally close their stores after the Christmas selling orgy that produces about a third of their annual sales. The truth is, Christmas is a secular holiday. If you doubt this, just look at the gifts that are given. Bibles make up an infinitesimally small percentage of Christmas gifts. What we buy has nothing to do with religion. But what we are trying to buy is magic: the magic of the season. And how odd, that we are told that we must buy it!

Here at church, I’ve been getting spammed with e-mails telling me what the hottest toys of this season are, presuming I might want to run out and buy them so I can feel the magic. It’s a confusing array. And somehow, each manufacturer has their own idea of the season’s hottest toy. I’ve read that the season’s hottest toy is the Microsoft X-Box 360, selling for $399. The company says they expect to sell over three million of them. They’re hot.

But there are so many hottest toys of the year! One e-mail says the hottest toy is the Remote control Hovercraft; another says no, it’s the Remote Control UFO that’s the hottest toy of the year. Then there’s the Twinkle Twirl Dance Studio with Twinkle Twirl Pony and Accessories. That’s hot. There’s the Ninja Turtles Sewer Lair Play Set, which is more than I want to know about that. Or the Barbie Swan Lake Unicorn, with Princess Barbie and Prince Ken. That doesn’t do a lot for me, but I’ll bet some of you have daughters who hope they get one. There’s even the Room Moodz 6″ Rotating Disco Ball Light for $14.99. I hope disco balls aren’t making a comeback!

The magic of the Christmas season is for sale in stores, through catalogs and online, delivered to your door to transform your Christmas into the magical sort of thing you think you want. These gifts are promising to make your holiday season, to connect it with that larger power that you don’t have. It’s the power of being really cool, excited, keeping up with or staying ahead of your friends. You know, you can’t buy just any Sewer Lair Play Set. It won’t be the right brand. It won’t have the kind of magic that only the Ninja Turtles Sewer Lair Play Set has. And you can’t just go down to the Dollar Store and buy some scruffy old unicorn. It won’t have the magic of the Barbie Swan Lake Unicorn, with Princess Barbie and Prince Ken. Just ask your kids. We’re not buying toys; we’re buying holiday magic. And we’ll spend an average of $700 to $1,000 buying it because we aren’t being told that we have the magic within us. This reminds me a lot of those psychic vampires. And think about all these hot toys, and what we do with them. We use them alone. We go off alone, absorbed in our X-Box 360, or the Twinkle Twirl Dance Studio or those sewer turtles. This magic we’re spending so much money for takes us away from contact with almost all the real human beings around us.

But you know this can’t be right. Even saying it out loud sounds silly. We’ve been convinced that holiday magic is something we have to buy, that we don’t have it and can’t call it forth on our own; we have to buy it. And it’s a strange and transient kind of magic, at that. Because the magic of this year’s hottest toys won’t even last a year. Next year these toys won’t have the magic any more. It never ends. Can real magic expire in just a year? Can it be as easy as charging it on a credit card? Is that really what we’re after? I know psychic vampires have to hunt continually for new life to steal, but is that the best we can do?

This is where I want to bring in a different way of looking at the magic we’re looking for. It’s a lens borrowed from Christianity, though one we seldom think about. It’s what the choir sang about this morning. They sang selections from Vivaldi’s Magnificat. Some of you will know where that word “Magnificat” comes from, and some of you won’t. It comes from the Gospel of Luke, Chapter 1 verse 46, from the Christian myth of the birth of Jesus. This gospel was written about eight years after the man Jesus was born, half a century after he died, so it’s imaginative religious storytelling, not history. We really don’t know a thing about just where or when the man Jesus was born. Still, it’s a lovely story. Mary’s friend Elizabeth tells her that her baby will be the Messiah. For centuries, Jewish women hoped, at least at some level, that their baby might be the long-awaited Messiah, and Mary has just been told, in this story written more than eighty years after Jesus’ birth, that her baby will be the one. That’s when she said the line that has launched a thousand concerts: “My soul magnifies the Lord.” That’s what the Latin word “magnificat” means: magnifies. My soul magnifies the Lord. Mary was saying “I carry within me magic of the highest order, the magic of God himself, placed in my womb to be born into the world. My soul magnifies the Lord!”

Sure, this is wrapped in that archaic language of a first-century myth; but you have a feeling for what it means. It’s about real magic! Not bought, not something that will wear thin by next season, but a gift of life, a visitation of all that is most holy, growing right there inside of your body. Every mother knows the feeling; every father can relate to it. Today, we get a set of plastic Barbie and Ken dolls, or some sewer turtles. And what does that magnify? The power of advertising to convince us that we want things we don’t really need? Is that what our souls magnify at Christmastime today? The power and the glory of advertisers taking advantage of our gullibility by tapping into our yearning for some high magic?

Mary’s magic was free. And really, in Jewish teachings, all people are the sons and daughters of God, who was their heavenly Father. It was magic, and it was free. Today, we get Barbie and Ken, and we buy them because we’ve been taught that we don’t have the magic in us any more. It’s a lie, but as long as we believe it, it’s true.

Think back this week on your very favorite, your most magical, Christmases, and see what made them so magical. I can remember some from my childhood. And I can’t remember a single present that I got at any of those best Christmases. It was other things: the feeling of our family being together, being happy, the wonderful smells of pine needles, and of cookies and bread baking, the magic of Santa Claus. We put out milk and cookies for Santa every Christmas Eve, and knew for a fact that there was a Santa because every Christmas morning, they were gone. Our father helped us choose the right kind of cookies; he seemed to know just what Santa liked. Then there was that warm glow of the multi-colored tree lights, and the glow in all the windows up and down the street. It was all magic. Nothing Christian about it, but it was magic. And what did our souls magnify? I think it was as simple as the joy of being together, being in a safe place where love lived and we lived, and where we mingled with love and called the place Home. I don’t mean I didn’t often hope for certain presents, but I can’t remember what any of them were.

What about you? When you think back on your best holidays, what did your soul magnify? What spirit were you channeling? What kind of powers or gods were you serving? I’ll bet they were happy ones, warm ones that cherished you and cherished those around you. Your soul magnified the power of love, and gratitude, and that magnification transformed the holidays into something special, something magical. But it was home-grown magic that accomplished the miracle: not store-bought magic.

We pay a fortune for gifts each year, gifts that will be out of fashion within a few months, because we have forgotten that the real magic of the season is all around us. But the center of this season is all about what we are magnifying with our souls. If Mary had said “My soul magnifies the fads of the season,” nobody would have cared. If she had rejoiced in stealing life from God, who was her newest victim, nobody would even have written it down, because you can’t get it more wrong than that.

Our souls are going to magnify something this season. Maybe just Microsoft’s profits and the stock portfolios of those who own a lot of Microsoft stock. Maybe just the fads of the season, new hot toys that start losing their heat within weeks. And in some ways, we spend all the money because, like psychic vampires, we think we’re missing something that can only be taken or bought from others. It never ends, because it’s looking for magic in all the wrong places.

I hope we can magnify more important things this holiday season. Like the warmth of a mutual relationship with another live human being. Like learning that it isn’t the love we buy or steal that saves us; it’s the love we share. This is the season of infinite dreams, when we dream even of finding, and magnifying, things like love, life, tenderness, compassion, the Holy Spirit – the spirit of the God of Love. Let our souls magnify all that is truly holy and life-giving this season. The very best magic is free; it’s still the only enduring miracle of this or any other season.